Search for: "Andrews v. State of California"
Results 481 - 500
of 895
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Jun 2015, 4:00 am
In Glossip v. [read post]
28 Jun 2015, 4:13 pm
On 25 June 2015 Andrews J heard an application in the case of Rio Tinto v Vale. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 1:30 pm
United States, holding that increasing sentences under the residual clause of the Armed Career Criminal Act violates the Constitution, and Obergefell v. [read post]
17 Jun 2015, 9:18 am
While some states define “service animals” more broadly, California (remarkably) adopts the more restrictive federal guidelines set forth in Title III. [read post]
8 Jun 2015, 10:55 am
The draft Copyright Office for the Digital Economy ("CODE") Act is being introduced by Democratic Representative Judy Chu (California) and Republican Tom Marino (Pennsylvania). [read post]
1 Jun 2015, 4:47 pm
In Klayman v. [read post]
26 May 2015, 8:57 am
MDEQ v. [read post]
7 May 2015, 11:31 am
Olah, “My Search for Carbocations and Their Role in Chemistry,” Nobel Lecture (Dec. 8, 1994), quoting George von Békésy, Experiments in Hearing 8 (N.Y. 1960); see also McMillan v. [read post]
1 May 2015, 4:25 am
On Wednesday, the Court heard oral arguments in Glossip v. [read post]
29 Apr 2015, 4:46 pm
Still, sometimes, as in United States v. [read post]
28 Apr 2015, 11:45 am
He suggested that laws banning same-sex marriage can be justified based on the Supreme Court’s decision in Tuan Anh Nguyen v. [read post]
28 Apr 2015, 2:47 am
At Mayer Brown’s Class Defense Blog, Andrew Pincus and others discuss the grant in Spokeo Inc. v. [read post]
19 Apr 2015, 10:10 am
Cincinnati Specialty Underwriters Insurance Co. v. [read post]
6 Apr 2015, 11:38 am
Will they be governed by the precedents concerning aircraft flyovers, like California v. [read post]
19 Mar 2015, 9:59 pm
By Andrew Williams -- United States District Judge Seeborg of the Northern District of California denied Amgen's motion for a preliminary injunction today in the Amgen v. [read post]
3 Mar 2015, 2:58 pm
The Court of Appeal says that "Andrew R. [read post]
22 Feb 2015, 1:44 pm
John’s Anglican Church in Petaluma, CA; Episcopal Diocese of Northern California v. [read post]
2 Feb 2015, 2:56 pm
The Ninth Circuit is, of course, not bound by a state court’s interpretation of the First Amendment; but even under the California Supreme Court’s “transformative work” test, all these works, including the fantasy football video games involved in Kellerand in this case, are constitutionally protected. [read post]
29 Jan 2015, 9:05 pm
” [Andrew Grossman; Cato brief in Michigan v. [read post]
22 Jan 2015, 4:14 pm
The California Supreme Court’s decision in Iskanian v. [read post]
