Search for: "Ball v. Ball" Results 481 - 500 of 3,593
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 May 2022, 1:26 pm by Christine Corcos
Even if one sees the law as “a self-contained system of legal reasoning” from which we deduce “neutral,” non-political conclusions from “general principles and analogies among cases and doctrines” (including formalist claims that judges simply call “balls and strikes” like umpires in a baseball game), one should still consider certain characteristics of the party making such deductions or calling such “balls and strikes. [read post]
3 May 2022, 1:26 pm
Even if one sees the law as “a self-contained system of legal reasoning” from which we deduce “neutral,” non-political conclusions from “general principles and analogies among cases and doctrines” (including formalist claims that judges simply call “balls and strikes” like umpires in a baseball game), one should still consider certain characteristics of the party making such deductions or calling such “balls and strikes. [read post]
12 Mar 2013, 7:38 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
[A]ny need or problem known in the field of endeavor at the time of invention and addressed by the patent can provide a reason for combining the elements in the manner claimed.KSR Int’l Co. v. [read post]
4 Dec 2021, 3:52 am
 Per Turley (perturbingly):She said many abortion opponents, including the sponsors of the Mississippi abortion law at issue, hoped her three new colleagues would allow for the reversal or reduction of Roe v. [read post]
30 Dec 2014, 9:40 am
HereSven tests out the sleepingarrangements ...The case in question is Prosecutor General v CS (Case B-5484-13) and it runs like this. [read post]
7 Oct 2011, 8:01 am by Sonya Hubbard
(There’s an interesting discussion here about the differences between the Falcon 900 and the other CEO-jet of choice, the Gulfstream V.) [read post]
17 Aug 2010, 2:59 am
Supreme Court's recent decision in Monsanto v. [read post]
22 Sep 2021, 9:58 am by Dale Carpenter
[It's the one amicus brief supporting Mississippi's abortion restriction that takes a wrecking ball to the Supreme Court's fundamental-rights precedents] In an earlier post, I noted that the vast majority of the 81 briefs in Dobbs v. [read post]