Search for: "Bell v. People" Results 481 - 500 of 1,156
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Nov 2008, 12:28 pm
(Content Agenda) MPAA effectively shuts down largest fan edit movie site (Techdirt) Final judgment: SCO owes Novell millions (plus interest) (Ars Technica) Coupons, Inc drops DMCA lawsuit against coupon hacker (Ars Technica) (Techdirt) McCain responds to Jackson Browne lawsuit (Techdirt) Judge quashes subpoenas where Boston University could not identify John Does ‘to reasonable degree of technical certainty: London Sire Records v Does 1-4 (Recording Industry vs The… [read post]
22 Jun 2014, 5:31 pm by INFORRM
The Federal Court, in the decision in Henry v Bell Mobility 2014 FC 555 has awarded a very modest sum of damages to a customer of Bell Mobility whose phone account was accessed by an impostor. [read post]
10 Jan 2011, 11:53 am by Sheppard Mullin
The District Court dismissed Jacobs’ complaint for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted under Bell Atlantic Corp. v. [read post]
13 Oct 2014, 10:10 pm
Bell, a case that no one, liberal or conservative would defend today. [read post]
30 Apr 2018, 2:31 pm by Eugene Volokh
" The reason this was most disturbing is that I had eaten Taco Bell for dinner that night. [read post]
4 Aug 2016, 12:21 pm by Richard Primus
  If Gary Johnson had said "I'd want Justices who applied the jurisprudence we associate with Lochner v. [read post]
16 Jul 2015, 5:00 pm by Kent Scheidegger
  If yes, the law is little changed as a practical matter, and the same people will be convicted, by and large. [read post]
25 Aug 2010, 2:13 pm by Adam Thierer
But as the Supreme Court held in United States v. [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 4:00 am by Terry Hart
While Kirtsaeng involves textbooks, one of the traditionally copyright protected works, other cases, including the two previous cases involving these provisions to reach the Supreme Court (Costco v Omega and Quality King v L’anza Research), involve consumer goods, goods that we don’t typically think of as within the subject matter of copyright. [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 4:00 am by Terry Hart
While Kirtsaeng involves textbooks, one of the traditionally copyright protected works, other cases, including the two previous cases involving these provisions to reach the Supreme Court (Costco v Omega and Quality King v L’anza Research), involve consumer goods, goods that we don’t typically think of as within the subject matter of copyright. [read post]