Search for: "Best v. Best"
Results 481 - 500
of 37,691
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Feb 2016, 3:09 am
District Court’s recent ruling in Silberstein v. [read post]
6 Dec 2010, 9:16 pm
Robert Males, writing in New Law Journal, expressed the view that: "I believe the solicitor is the best person to deal with negotiation and settlement of costs. [read post]
7 Jun 2016, 1:27 pm
In the federal system, imposition of a sentence within the guidelines range was mandatory until the Supreme Court’s decision in United States v. [read post]
30 Mar 2011, 10:57 am
There is an ongoing debate in the legal community about whether the iPhone or the Android is best for attorneys and their practices. [read post]
16 Dec 2020, 1:48 pm
Author: Bill Pizzi, emeritus University of Colorado Law SchoolAbortion and the Law in America: Roe v. [read post]
31 Oct 2017, 3:00 am
In Smith v. [read post]
22 Aug 2014, 5:17 am
Co. v. [read post]
13 Aug 2024, 12:35 pm
The best predictor of future behavior is past behavior. [read post]
4 Sep 2018, 8:17 am
A 2003 case, Hays v. [read post]
21 Nov 2013, 2:37 am
Is it not interesting here to contrast Judge Chin's approach with the position of the Court of Justice of the European Union way back in 1995, in Joined Cases C-241/91 P and C-242/91 P Radio Telefis Eireann (RTE) and Independent Television Publications Ltd (ITP) v Commission of the European Communities (the Magill TV Guide case), where that court did not have any ground upon which to invoke a fair use or fair dealing doctrine but had to apply competition law where the existence… [read post]
2 Oct 2015, 9:11 am
In the recent case of Nelson v. [read post]
3 Dec 2015, 2:47 pm
In his article titled Estate Planning for a Family with a Special Needs Child, Sebastian V. [read post]
8 Jul 2010, 2:14 am
A v East Sussex County Council and another [2010] EWCA Civ 743; [2010] WLR (D) 171 “Even where emergency powers were obtained under s 44 of the Children Act 1989 or exercised under s 46 of the 1989 Act to remove a child from the risk of harm, least interventions were best. [read post]
11 Dec 2011, 6:14 pm
” Abouzahr v. [read post]
22 Jan 2024, 8:56 am
In Seeback v. [read post]
27 Apr 2017, 11:08 am
Most recently, in Gallup Inc. v. [read post]
26 Apr 2024, 10:25 am
“The Republican Justices Do Not Want to Talk About Donald Trump’s Coup Attempt; Trump v. [read post]
4 Mar 2017, 10:15 am
Specifically, in Sams v Common Ground, when William Sams was hired by Common Ground he signed an employment contract. [read post]
27 Oct 2013, 3:03 pm
However, as my earlier posts on the ‘2 v. 3 debate’ suggest, I cannot imagine a respectable legal academia that is not at least minimally responsive to the concerns and norms of academia more generally. [read post]
22 Dec 2010, 3:30 pm
Happy Christmas and all the best for 2011! [read post]
