Search for: "Board of Public Instruction v. State"
Results 481 - 500
of 1,454
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Jun 2019, 2:50 pm
That the Board should now consider that it suddenly has an obligation to decide cases “in the public interest” is astonishing. [read post]
20 Jun 2019, 2:59 pm
For example, a unanimous New Jersey Supreme Court invalidated such an ordinance in its 2009 decision in State of New Jersey v. [read post]
18 Jun 2019, 6:42 am
This case has been the subject of extensive commentary by scholars and practitioners in the short time since its publication. [read post]
14 Jun 2019, 1:57 pm
Public choice makes it messy. [read post]
10 Jun 2019, 2:11 pm
Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes noted in Biddle v. [read post]
9 Jun 2019, 9:05 pm
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board that the President has extremely broad authority under the Constitution’s Appointments Clause to remove “Officers of the United States” and that Congress has only limited power to regulate what the President does. [read post]
27 May 2019, 8:51 pm
RESOURCE PAGE: Link: HB 2048 House Bill 3703 – Medical Marijuana Signed by the Governor, Effective Sept. 1, 2019 HB 3703 expands the state’s medical marijuana program by allowing Board Certified doctors to prescribe low-THC marijuana for:1. [read post]
24 May 2019, 2:00 am
In Franchise Tax Board of California v. [read post]
20 May 2019, 10:18 am
As for the placebo effect instruction, Allen relied on FTC v. [read post]
19 May 2019, 9:01 pm
Indeed, in Gratz v. [read post]
9 May 2019, 4:00 am
Initially, respondent argues that certain of petitioner’s allegations allege a binding past practice and that such claims are within the exclusive jurisdiction of the Public Employment Relations Board. [read post]
9 May 2019, 4:00 am
Initially, respondent argues that certain of petitioner’s allegations allege a binding past practice and that such claims are within the exclusive jurisdiction of the Public Employment Relations Board. [read post]
9 May 2019, 4:00 am
Initially, respondent argues that certain of petitioner’s allegations allege a binding past practice and that such claims are within the exclusive jurisdiction of the Public Employment Relations Board. [read post]
9 May 2019, 4:00 am
Initially, respondent argues that certain of petitioner’s allegations allege a binding past practice and that such claims are within the exclusive jurisdiction of the Public Employment Relations Board. [read post]
6 May 2019, 4:56 am
The Historical Board held a public hearing in which the plan was adopted and a Certificate of Appropriateness was granted. [read post]
26 Apr 2019, 11:10 am
See Toronto Real Estate Board v. [read post]
26 Apr 2019, 9:53 am
Contrary to the Court’s meek disclaimer, it was not at all clear that the holding in El Apple applied across the board, as opposed to just the employment context, where Texas substantive law is an analogue to federal civil rights law, and perhaps a few other select areas of law. [read post]
23 Apr 2019, 6:30 pm
A complacency that has not only continued since the Supreme Court of Canada has condemned it in the seminal case of R. v. [read post]
23 Apr 2019, 6:30 pm
A complacency that has not only continued since the Supreme Court of Canada has condemned it in the seminal case of R. v. [read post]
17 Apr 2019, 7:41 am
This is when a board or commission applies the law to a set of specific facts. [read post]
