Search for: "CALIFORNIA v. NEVADA."
Results 481 - 500
of 1,112
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Jun 2020, 6:48 am
LOS ANGELES–(BUSINESS WIRE)–Glancy Prongay & Murray LLP (“GPM”) announces that it has filed a class action lawsuit in the United States District Court for the District of Nevada captioned Chowdhury v. [read post]
6 Mar 2023, 6:59 pm
Kuhn’s solution: the states of the “lower basin” – California, Arizona, Nevada – should agree to an interstate compact. [read post]
22 Jul 2013, 5:46 am
California, supra. [read post]
17 Mar 2023, 9:08 am
Nevada v. [read post]
8 Jan 2013, 9:04 am
Water Replenishment District Of Southern California(2012) 211 Cal.App.4th 943: A 1991 groundwater basin judgment provided the legal framework for a later, 2010 declaration of water emergency. [read post]
4 Aug 2011, 6:53 am
In Dep't of Fish and Game v. [read post]
15 Feb 2023, 4:43 am
BASSIRI V. [read post]
10 May 2009, 5:53 pm
California, et al. [read post]
20 Apr 2012, 3:30 am
Supreme Court took up the case of United States v. [read post]
11 Dec 2019, 8:10 am
Vermont and Rhode Island also acted to ensure that the right to make decisions regarding pregnancy will remain protected in their states, regardless of what the Supreme Court might do to Roe v. [read post]
29 Sep 2016, 8:50 am
” It covers other states as well, including Arizona, Nevada, Hawaii, and Alaska. [read post]
22 Dec 2006, 1:30 pm
FERC and PUC v. [read post]
30 Jun 2022, 1:43 pm
However, there are streets named “Truckee” in several cities and towns in Colorado, as well as in Arizona, California, Idaho, and Nevada. [read post]
29 Mar 2011, 9:41 am
Court of Appeals of California, Third District, Sacramento. [read post]
11 Dec 2020, 1:45 pm
Sisolak, a Nevada church is challenging Gov. [read post]
11 Dec 2014, 10:27 am
The Court’s unanimous decision in Integrity Staffing Solutions, Inc. v. [read post]
12 Dec 2014, 10:09 am
The Court’s unanimous decision in Integrity Staffing Solutions, Inc. v. [read post]
23 Jan 2011, 8:19 pm
Comm v. [read post]
25 Jun 2022, 6:50 pm
Wade and Planned Parenthood v. [read post]
24 Aug 2009, 6:07 am
The 9th traces how "slight" can be understood as "substantial" in state interpretation, and how 9th Circuit precedent for the State of Nevada's interpretation of that phrase is co-extensive with California's. [read post]
