Search for: "CHEVRON CORP"
Results 481 - 500
of 714
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Feb 2012, 10:31 am
Chevron USA, Inc., 680 F.Supp. 2d 865 (S.D. [read post]
21 Jun 2012, 11:46 am
Legacy Vulcan Corp.38. [read post]
30 Oct 2013, 5:55 pm
And, also since that time, a vocal group of judges and lawyers have decried the wastefulness of this system while others have defended it as a proper allocation of responsibility.So much for the background.In NSK Corp. v. [read post]
14 Jun 2016, 9:59 am
In our first decision, Comcast Corp. v. [read post]
5 May 2017, 1:37 pm
’” Chevron U. [read post]
12 Apr 2011, 3:50 pm
Chevron Chem. [read post]
12 Aug 2014, 6:13 am
However, because the ARB’s rejection of its earlier standard was persuasive, even under lesser Skidmore deference, the appeals court found that it did not need to decide whether the board’s interpretation of Sec. 1514A merited Chevron deference. [read post]
31 May 2015, 4:29 pm
Corp., in which the Second Circuit concluded that Sylvester’s rejection of the “definitively and specifically” standard “is persuasive even under lesser Skidmore deference” and declined to reach whether the ARB’s interpretations of Section 1514A were entitled to Chevron deference. [read post]
10 Dec 2019, 12:39 pm
Yankee Nuclear Power Corp. v. [read post]
8 Mar 2020, 9:01 pm
Chenery Corp. [read post]
18 Jul 2013, 9:52 pm
(ENDP) and Boston Scientific Corp. [read post]
18 Mar 2010, 11:12 am
[2] Chevron, U.S.A., Inc. v. [read post]
13 Nov 2011, 8:27 am
Cooper Chevron Fellow Chevron Corp. [read post]
19 Dec 2019, 9:01 pm
”That is not the only reason Chevron is the quintessential administrative law case, however. [read post]
26 Mar 2018, 4:24 pm
We believe that the courts ultimately will uphold such clauses under Delaware law, especially based on the Court of Chancery decision in the Chevron case.[1] Chevron held that forum clauses with respect to breach-of-fiduciary-duty claims are valid and enforceable. [read post]
10 Sep 2010, 8:07 am
See Ex parte Chevron Chemical Co., 720 So.2d 922, 928 n.6 (Ala. 1998). [read post]
23 Jun 2016, 8:46 am
SmithKline Beecham Corp. when considering the exempt status of pharmaceutical sales representatives, may be of use to employers in challenging other recent DOL regulatory changes. [read post]
21 May 2013, 7:49 am
In PPL Corp. v. [read post]
23 Apr 2012, 3:00 am
Company – Chevron v. [read post]
22 Jul 2014, 9:05 am
Chevron U.S.A., Inc. v. [read post]
