Search for: "Cato v. State" Results 481 - 500 of 1,241
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Sep 2017, 4:17 am by Edith Roberts
In an op-ed at Bloomberg View, Noah Feldman discusses Masterpiece Cakeshop v. [read post]
12 Sep 2017, 2:57 am by Walter Olson
Federalist Society panel video with Thomas Brinkman, Jennifer Brunner, David Forte, Matt Huffman, Larry Obhof, Matthew Byrne [earlier on Article V conventions] Supreme Court opened — and should now close — “dual sovereignty” exception to rule against double jeopardy [Ilya Shapiro, Cato] Encyclopedia of Libertarianism, 2008, has articles on the U.S. [read post]
11 Sep 2017, 2:50 am by Walter Olson
Interesting admission by Canadian unionist: right-to-work laws in U.S. states “are bleeding jobs out of Canada. [read post]
10 Sep 2017, 9:05 pm by Walter Olson
My Cato Institute colleagues (Sept. 6) and the U.S. [read post]
6 Sep 2017, 4:18 am by Edith Roberts
At In a Crowded Theater, Erica Goldberg examines the petitioner’s free-speech arguments in Masterpiece Cakeshop v. [read post]
31 Aug 2017, 8:31 am by Andrew Hamm
National Collegiate Athletic Association, Oil States Energy Services LLC v. [read post]
29 Aug 2017, 7:56 am by Andrew Hamm
And at the Cato Institute’s Cato at Liberty blog, Ilya Shapiro discusses the institute’s amicus brief in Tyler v. [read post]
23 Aug 2017, 3:05 am by Walter Olson
[The Guardian, ABA Journal; settlement presided over by California state agency] Encyclopedia of Libertarianism now free online thanks to Cato Institute. [read post]
22 Aug 2017, 8:18 am by Andrew Hamm
” At the Cato Institute’s Cato at Liberty blog, Ilya Shapiro, David Kopel and Matthew Larosiere discuss the institute’s amicus brief in Kolbe v. [read post]
18 Aug 2017, 3:53 am by Edith Roberts
At the Cato Institute’s Cato at Liberty blog, Ilya Shapiro urges the Supreme Court to review a case that offers the justices “an excellent opportunity to preferably overrule, but at least reconsider,” a prior decision requiring “a property owner [to] first sue in state court to ripen a federal takings claim”; he argues that the “state-remedies requirement results in constitutional absurdity: the very state court… [read post]
15 Aug 2017, 4:02 am by Edith Roberts
” In an op-ed at STAT, Michael Burg weighs in on the court’s recent opinion in Bristol-Myers Squibb Co. v. [read post]
14 Aug 2017, 4:17 am by Edith Roberts
” At the Cato Institute’s Cato at Liberty blog, Ilya Shapiro argues that to resolve Carpenter v. [read post]
1 Aug 2017, 3:02 am by Walter Olson
Nevertheless, the court held that what the Hartes experienced qualified as unreasonable search and seizure – and also let them continue with their state-law claims – so Harte v. [read post]
11 Jul 2017, 4:20 am by Edith Roberts
” At ACSblog, Bidish Sarma discusses Packingham v. [read post]