Search for: "D Booker" Results 481 - 500 of 612
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Mar 2010, 4:42 am by Russ Bensing
  I’d be interested in knowing the results, but I kind of think there are some people who wouldn’t. [read post]
15 Mar 2010, 10:14 am by Hilde
After Stevens What will the Supreme Court be like without its liberal leader? … [read post]
26 Feb 2010, 5:29 am by Ernie Svenson
 Last night after watching the movie, I decided to send a short tweet to him saying I enjoyed the movie and hoped he'd keep up the good fight. [read post]
22 Jan 2010, 3:25 am by Russ Bensing
Of course, that was then; now we’re in the post-Booker and post-Foster world, where the Federal guidelines are now merely “advisory” and Ohio judges have virtually unfettered discretion in sentencing. [read post]
6 Dec 2009, 2:50 pm by Steve Kalar
(Recall his admirable and famous decision in the post-Booker Ranum opinion (blog on Ranum available here)). [read post]
13 Nov 2009, 8:34 pm
I suspect that Morris does not lose any sleep over the fact that she did not win the Booker; I hope note, for I'd cetainly rather read her than any of those who did. [read post]
5 Nov 2009, 11:04 am
  SCOTUS and the Circuits --- for failing to give reasonableness review any substantive content D. [read post]
20 Oct 2009, 3:35 pm by Jon Sands
Under Booker, though, a jury must find the facts on which imprisonment is justified. [read post]
2 Oct 2009, 1:32 pm by Bob
”Cory Booker, the mayor of Newark, responded with this humorous video and jokingly informed Conan he’d been added to the No Fly list for Newark’s EWR airport.I knew right away this was a joke, (a pretty funny one I thought) but after reading some comments around the blogosphere, it seems that some are buying this gag. [read post]
20 Sep 2009, 1:17 pm
Carter, 560 F.3d 1107, 1124 (9th Cir. 2009), and has "curse[d] the opacity of the guidance [the Ninth Circuit has] received from above" in the post-Booker era. [read post]
18 Aug 2009, 11:04 am
Booker empowered district courts, not appellate courts . . . . [read post]