Search for: "Davies v. the People"
Results 481 - 500
of 2,231
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Feb 2020, 9:01 pm
United States and Free Enterprise Fund v. [read post]
2 Feb 2020, 4:41 pm
Rob Davies, a Guardian journalist was denied a press pass for a major gambling industry exhibition. [read post]
27 Jan 2020, 9:01 am
Similarly, in R.E. v. [read post]
21 Jan 2020, 5:03 am
AB v. [read post]
14 Jan 2020, 11:46 am
” United States v. [read post]
12 Jan 2020, 6:47 pm
, 1960 CanLII 37 (SCC), [1960] S.C.R. 361, per Judson J., at p. 368, quoting Davis Contractors Ltd. v. [read post]
6 Jan 2020, 9:04 am
And more recently, in Paul v. [read post]
27 Dec 2019, 7:55 am
” This overbroad formulation is a far cry from the definition set forth by the Supreme Court in Davis v. [read post]
26 Dec 2019, 12:37 pm
A defendant who rapes and kills multiple people over a three-week crime spree, and for whom it's totally clear why multiple juries sentenced him to death. [read post]
11 Dec 2019, 9:01 pm
Sanders and Reynolds v. [read post]
5 Dec 2019, 10:36 am
Banister v. [read post]
2 Dec 2019, 6:00 am
Last week’s post dove into the controversial story of the West Memphis Three, focusing on how the interrogation of Jesse Misskelley offers a strong tool in the criminal procedure classroom for teaching the Fourteenth Amendment’s voluntariness doctrine. [read post]
1 Dec 2019, 4:05 pm
On 29 November 2019 Davis LJ and Warby J handed down the reserved judgment in the case of R (Liberal Democrats) v ITV Broadcasting Ltd [2019] EWHC 3282 (Admin), giving the full reasons for the dismissal of the application for judicial review. [read post]
1 Dec 2019, 6:30 am
Mirow (Florida International University); Daniel Lord Smail (Harvard University); David V. [read post]
25 Nov 2019, 6:25 am
As Justice Kennedy wrote in his Davis v. [read post]
25 Nov 2019, 2:00 am
Todd Hawkins et al. v. [read post]
22 Nov 2019, 3:03 am
Kennerly Davis, Federalist Society] Tags: administrative law, Chevron, Idaho, regulation and its reform, taxes [read post]
17 Nov 2019, 4:08 pm
The Court also described the award of damages – for an email sent to 16 people – as “manifestly excessive” and said no more than $25,000 would have been appropriate. [read post]
14 Nov 2019, 9:01 pm
Davis, which require proof of invidious intent. [read post]
14 Nov 2019, 4:21 am
It identified only two situations in which such a cause of action does not exist: first, if “special factors counsel hesitation in the absence of affirmative action by Congress,” (see also Davis v. [read post]
