Search for: "Davis v. Grant" Results 481 - 500 of 2,629
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Nov 2019, 4:08 pm by INFORRM
Data Privacy and Data Protection The Court of Appeal have granted permission to appeal in the facial recognition technology case of Bridges v Chief Constable of South Wales Police. [read post]
17 Nov 2019, 4:08 pm by INFORRM
Arts Two Lecture Theatre, Ground Floor, Mile End Road, Queen Mary University of London, London E1 4NS 27 November 2019, Defamation, Data, Privacy: Shaping the New Law, White Paper Conference, The Caledonian Club, 9 Halkin Street, London SW1X 7DR [£] 28 November 2019, SCL Privacy and Data Protection Group event: Transitioning from GDPR to global compliance, Kemp Little LLP, 138 Cheapside, London EC2V 6BJ [£] Media Law in Other Jurisdictions Australia On 15 November 2019, in the… [read post]
14 Nov 2019, 4:21 am by Robert Black
It identified only two situations in which such a cause of action does not exist: first, if “special factors counsel hesitation in the absence of affirmative action by Congress,” (see also Davis v. [read post]
12 Nov 2019, 3:42 am by Edith Roberts
Patent and Trademark Office v. [read post]
6 Nov 2019, 11:30 am by John Elwood
If this case is granted, it may be the first time in the court’s history that its plenary docket features two website names in case captions. [read post]
2 Nov 2019, 12:11 pm by Randall Hodgkinson
Davis[Reversed; Biles; January 24, 2020]Insufficient evidence of "dwelling" to prove residential burglaryState v. [read post]
30 Oct 2019, 4:11 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
An attorney may not be held liable for failing to act outside the scope of a retainer (see AmBase Corp. v Davis Polk & Wardwell, 8 NY3d 428 [2007]). [read post]
20 Oct 2019, 1:27 pm by Giles Peaker
I agree that the criteria in Ladd v Marshall are not absolute rules and must give way to the interests of justice, but this case is not on all fours, nor even close, to Davis v Wiggett . [read post]
13 Oct 2019, 4:39 pm by INFORRM
On the same day, in Bourne v Nejad ([2019] EWHC 2605 (QB)), Steyn J granted defaulted judgment in favour of a partner at law firm Knights, granting an injunction to prevent a former Oxford University student making “false and damaging allegations”, notably the publication of certain defamatory words, against him. [read post]
9 Oct 2019, 2:05 am by INFORRM
The Court of Appeal (Dame Victoria Sharp P, Sir Geoffrey Vos C and Davis LJ) unanimously allowed Mr Lloyd’s appeal (with the Chancellor giving the only substantive judgment), granting him permission to serve out. [read post]