Search for: "Department of Commerce v. New York"
Results 481 - 500
of 824
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Aug 2019, 9:20 am
Chris Cox and Ron Wyden drafted what would become Section 230 in 1995, after Cox read a newspaper article about a New York state trial court’s ruling in Stratton Oakmont v. [read post]
28 Feb 2012, 7:34 am
The House Energy and Commerce subcommittee on Oversight and Investigations will hold a hearing on the Department of Energy’s Smart Grid Security programs, reports Brendan Sasso at The Hill. [read post]
13 Aug 2009, 1:40 am
District Court for the Southern District of New York on July 12, 200908/12/2009
Dear Colleague Letter From Rep. [read post]
5 Mar 2024, 1:51 pm
And, yes, we expect Trump will promptly be sued in the Southern District of New York due to his continuing (indirect) ownership interest in Trump Tower. [read post]
24 Jul 2019, 8:16 am
New York, Knick v. [read post]
11 Sep 2015, 2:01 am
You can contact Arkady at Bukh Law Firm, P.C., 14 Wall St, New York NY 10005, (212) 729-1632, https://www.nyccriminallawyer.com ******************************************* Resolving a Four Way Split The federal bank fraud statute provides: “Whoever knowingly executes, or attempts to execute, a scheme or artifice – (1) to defraud a financial institution; or (2) to obtain any of the moneys, funds, credits, assets, securities, or other property owned by, or… [read post]
15 Jan 2015, 9:57 am
Verizon New York, Inc. 14-439Issue: (1) Whether the exhaustion requirements of Williamson County Regional Planning Commission v. [read post]
6 Feb 2019, 6:17 pm
See NLRB v. [read post]
2 Mar 2016, 2:56 pm
The New York City Department of Health and Mental Hygiene et al., No. 654024/2015, Supreme Court of New York, New York County). [read post]
2 Mar 2016, 2:56 pm
The New York City Department of Health and Mental Hygiene et al., No. 654024/2015, Supreme Court of New York, New York County). [read post]
3 Sep 2023, 9:43 am
There is no question that the government can enforce its laws – that’s what the Department of Justice does. [read post]
29 Aug 2008, 1:25 pm
Here is IP Think Tank’s weekly selection of top intellectual property news breaking in the blogosphere and internet. [read post]
15 Jun 2023, 6:30 am
Usery (1976) – in particular, the anticommandeering cases such as New York v. [read post]
31 Jan 2016, 4:00 am
-> Scope of FOI requests in a competition matter Pro-Sys Consultants Ltd. v. [read post]
20 Jun 2008, 8:47 am
District Court for the Southern District of New York Against Two Former Bear Stearns Asset Management Portfolio Managers for Misleading Investors06/19/2008
Correspondence: Department of Energy: Information on Its Management of Costs and Liabilities for Contractors' Pension and Postretirement Benefit Plans (PDF 1.04 MB)GAO Report to Congressional Committees06/19/2008
Dear Colleague Letter From House Judiciary Chairman John Conyers and Rep. [read post]
13 Aug 2020, 1:55 am
In New Hampshire, which forgoes an income tax and is home to many residents who normally work out of offices in Massachusetts, the state Department of Justice is exploring Massachusetts’ new sourcing rule with an eye to possible litigation. [read post]
14 Jun 2007, 12:57 am
2nd Circuit Upholds Congress' Power to Pass Anti-Bootlegging Law
New York Law Journal
A law that criminalizes the bootlegging of live performances was a valid exercise of congressional power under the Commerce Clause, the 2nd U.S. [read post]
22 Feb 2018, 6:00 am
Knauff v. [read post]
30 Nov 2010, 10:00 am
Attorneys' Offices including the Southern District of New York; District of Columbia; Middle District of Florida; District of Colorado; Southern District of Texas; Central District of California; Northern District of Ohio; District of New Jersey; and the Western District of Washington. [read post]
2 Jul 2019, 4:03 am
” Joshua Matz explains at Take Care why, contrary to “articles and tweets [that] have celebrated the Chief Justice for his bravery, principle, and (long-delayed) unwillingness to accept pretextual reasons for a Trump Administration policy” in Department of Commerce v. [read post]
