Search for: "Does 1-54"
Results 481 - 500
of 3,387
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Jul 2010, 3:45 am
How does one understand the various factors? [read post]
12 Aug 2023, 11:45 am
"Modelling social inclusion, self-esteem, loneliness, psychological distress, and psychological resilience of refugees: Does hospitableness matter? [read post]
29 Jul 2017, 9:56 am
Doc. 66, Pl.'s App.II.LEGAL STANDARDRule 54(d) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure governs costs and attorneys' fees. [read post]
30 Mar 2013, 1:34 am
Samsung trial in California could lead to a total damages award exceeding the original $1 billion verdict. [read post]
Ford Motor Company v. Washington (Ford III): The Third Time Is Not the Charm (and it ain’t over yet)
5 Jun 2013, 10:10 am
Id. at 1-2. [read post]
27 Oct 2011, 5:01 pm
This document does not explain from which materials and how they were made, nor has the [opponent] provided proof that they necessarily are or have to be moulded articles within the above meaning.[6.4] Therefore, the Board comes to the conclusion that claims 1 and 5 of auxiliary request 1 are novel within the meaning of A 54.Should you wish to download the whole decision (in German), just click here.The file wrapper can be found here. [read post]
27 Oct 2011, 1:49 pm
This document does not explain from which materials and how they were made, nor has the [opponent] provided proof that they necessarily are or have to be moulded articles within the above meaning.[6.4] Therefore, the Board comes to the conclusion that claims 1 and 5 of auxiliary request 1 are novel within the meaning of A 54.Should you wish to download the whole decision (in German), just click here.The file wrapper can be found here. [read post]
15 Jan 2013, 5:01 pm
Case Law, 6th ed., 2010, I.C.1.4). [6.4.3] The appellant proprietor contested at the oral proceedings (OPs) before the board that the unidentified prior art mentioned in the opposed patent at paragraph [0013] was state of the art under A 54(2) EPC 1973. [read post]
12 Jul 2010, 3:01 pm
However, this does not make the above adverse effect any more acceptable. [read post]
20 Jan 2011, 3:27 pm
Section 54:34-2c. [read post]
5 Sep 2016, 4:52 pm
”- “What does it mean to be an at-will employee? [read post]
5 Dec 2013, 11:44 am
Thus, beginning in Poughkeepsie at 5:04 AM, and starting the train at 5:54 AM, was a significant change in schedule for Mr. [read post]
13 Mar 2013, 5:04 am
However, before the EPO, an equivalent national patent application does not count as prior art. [read post]
17 Aug 2013, 3:56 am
P. 56(f) (“After giving noticeand a reasonable time to respond, the court may: (1) grantsummary judgment for a nonmovant; (2) grant the motionon grounds not raised by a party . . . [read post]
16 Jan 2013, 11:40 am
” See ’111 patent, col. 17, ll. 54-65. [read post]
25 Jun 2020, 5:55 pm
See FCA decision, paras. 54, 72 and 73.AC’s memorandum does at least mention the Vigneux decision. [read post]
9 Sep 2016, 12:50 pm
The brief is for me and 54 other antitrust and competition policy scholars (many of whom joined the antitrust scholars’ N.C. [read post]
14 Jun 2016, 1:43 pm
Merpel does not know. [read post]
30 Jul 2013, 3:00 am
Photovoltaic Manufacturing Consortium (PVMC), headquartered at CNSE as part of the DOE's SunShot Initiative. [read post]
23 Sep 2013, 7:25 am
He added that the right to vote was a right guaranteed in, inter alia, Article 3 of Protocol No. 1. [read post]
