Search for: "Ex parte B. J. S."
Results 481 - 500
of 803
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Feb 2019, 5:42 am
" Id. at ¶ 53 (Zimmerman, P.J., concurring in part and dissenting in part). [read post]
17 Oct 2008, 3:00 am
By Danny Friedmann Hong Kong has been part of the People’s Republic of China (PRC) since 1997. [read post]
2 Jan 2022, 4:01 pm
Accordingly, we AFFIRM the judgment of the district court (Abrams, J.). [read post]
20 Jul 2009, 2:00 am
CUSTOMS logo barred by sections 2(a) and 2(b): In re Peter S Herrick, PA (TTABlog) TTAB enters judgment on the pleadings against applicant who admitted non-use of its mark Esprit IP Limited v Mellbeck Ltd (not precedential) (TTABlog) WYHA? [read post]
23 Aug 2020, 3:30 pm
But, 529 plans contributed to AFTER the divorce will be considered as part of the contributing parent’s share of the college expenses. [read post]
17 Jun 2022, 9:07 pm
WILSON, J. [read post]
17 Jun 2022, 9:07 pm
WILSON, J. [read post]
20 Jun 2023, 6:07 am
§103(b). [read post]
30 Nov 2010, 10:25 am
Burke files an opinion concurring in part and dissenting in part, in which J. [read post]
27 Dec 2013, 3:22 am
J. [read post]
12 Dec 2013, 12:57 pm
[Footnote: Davis ex rel. [read post]
3 Apr 2017, 2:52 pm
A similar argument was rejected by the House of Lords in R v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions, ex p. [read post]
12 Mar 2016, 7:44 am
Commentator: Michael J. [read post]
26 Jun 2023, 11:41 am
Direct examination is the procedure where the prosecution questions those witnesses called as part of the state’s case. [read post]
27 Feb 2014, 7:48 am
, Part II, s 11; see also Redmond v.. [read post]
17 Oct 2016, 9:10 am
§ 949a(b)(3)(D), and that rule of evidence and law violate the confrontation clause. [read post]
5 Apr 2016, 7:34 am
HUGHES, an individual; and J. [read post]
4 Jan 2015, 4:04 pm
It might be thought surprising that a person has no remedy in respect of a false allegation which has a substantial negative effect on his personal life and relationships but this was, at least on Bean J’s view, the intent of the UK parliament. [read post]
14 Aug 2018, 2:28 am
" It may also be worthwhile to consider the observation made in T 2017/12, r.3.1.1 (the decision that led to the referral G 2/14):“The leading decision is J 21/80. [read post]
