Search for: "Fordham v. State" Results 481 - 500 of 658
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 May 2011, 4:55 am by Marie Louise
– another DO for Peru – “Maca Junín -Pasco” (IP tango) United Kingdom CARBON VIRGIN Trademark upheld in UK: EWCH (Ch) Virgin Enterprises Ltd v Casey decision (IP Factor) (IPKat) Before-the-event IP litigation insurance (IP finance) United States US General Fordham IP Conference 2011: part 1 to 6 (IPKat) (IPKat) (IPKat) (IPKat) (IPKat) (IPKat) Illinois Institute of Technology and Ocean Tomo announce collaboration on World IP Day (Patent… [read post]
13 Apr 2011, 2:08 pm by Pace Law School Library
Cracks on the wall: why states should be allowed to lead on climate change. 21 Fordham Envtl. [read post]
28 Feb 2011, 12:00 pm by Bill Ward
The varying approaches to this issue by different states can be seen in the New York State Court of Appeals in Kaur v. [read post]
16 Feb 2011, 2:16 pm by Pace Law School Library
State responsibility in promoting environmental corporate accountability. 21 Fordham Envtl. [read post]
2 Feb 2011, 2:23 pm by Steve Hall
” Coverage of the the civil suit begins at the post; Beaty v. [read post]
18 Jan 2011, 6:29 pm by Sonia Katyal
This week, my colleague, Jeanne Fromer, and myself had the pleasure of hosting a Tri-State conference on Intellectual Property at Fordham Law School. [read post]
7 Jan 2011, 12:52 pm by axd10
Fordham Law Review, Forthcoming, Case Legal Studies Research Paper No. 2010-24. [read post]
9 Dec 2010, 3:40 pm by axd10
A Matter of Context: Social Framework Evidence in Employment Discrimination Class Actions. 78 FORDHAM LAW REVIEW 37 (2009). [read post]
14 Nov 2010, 9:56 pm by Lyonette Louis-Jacques
  Hell’s Angels sued Alexander McQueen’s design firm for misusing their trademarked "death's head" skull and wings logo (Hells Angels Motorcycle Corporation v. [read post]
8 Nov 2010, 8:37 am by Rebecca Tushnet
The Fordham Intellectual Property, Media & Entertainment Law Journal's 2010 Symposium: Is Silence Golden? [read post]
28 Oct 2010, 9:47 am by Steve Hall
" The ruling also implied that the state's reticence left defendant Landrigan unable to meet his burden under the Supreme Court's 2008 decision in Baze v. [read post]