Search for: "GAY v. THOMAS" Results 481 - 500 of 527
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Dec 2019, 8:49 am by Amy Howe
On January 15, the court issued its first 5-4 decision of the term, in Stokeling v. [read post]
24 Apr 2009, 3:47 am
Motors Corp., No. 08-1113ADA - Benefits to former employeeso o SCOTUS docket hereAdam v. [read post]
2 May 2008, 7:00 am
Landmark IP implications for universities: University of Western Australia v Gray: (IPRoo), (Managing Intellectual Property), (The Age), The latest edition of US Trade Representative’s ‘Special 301 Report’: (Ars Technica), (Ars Technica), (IAM), (Intellectual Property Watch), (Patry Copyright Blog), (Managing Intellectual Property), (Patent Docs), (IP Law360), Court rejects RIAA ‘making available’ theory: Atlantic v Howell:… [read post]
8 Jul 2010, 5:34 am by Brandon Bartels
Sometime before commencement of the Supreme Court’s 2009 term, Mike Sacks, a third-year law student at Georgetown University, had an idea. [read post]
6 Jul 2021, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
Michigan Chamber of Commerce and of the four dissenters in Citizens United v. [read post]
30 Jun 2011, 3:08 pm by Lyle Denniston
   In 1936, when a Court majority stretched its judicial muscles in Ashwander v. [read post]
7 Feb 2012, 8:24 am by Lovechilde
  All three of these Reagan justices were in the majority in Bush v. [read post]
28 Jun 2020, 9:00 pm by Rodger Citron
Clayton County, the Court’s recent decision holding that the federal law prohibiting employment discrimination applies to gay, lesbian, and transgender employees. [read post]
20 Apr 2015, 1:29 pm by Amy Howe
This continues through (in order of seniority) Justice Clarence Thomas, Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Justice Stephen Breyer (who sits next to Justice Thomas and often has animated conversations with him), and Justice Sonia Sotomayor, until you get to Justice Elena Kagan, the Court’s junior Justice. [read post]
23 Apr 2023, 6:36 pm by Josh Blackman
Concerning private pacts, Biskupic does a flashback to NFIB v. [read post]
10 May 2010, 2:52 pm by ALeonard
Scholars of the Supreme Court have pointed out that the current Court is an anomaly in American history in being composed entirely of members who came to the Court after service (some of it relatively brief - as to which see Clarence Thomas and John Roberts) on the U.S. [read post]
1 Jul 2010, 5:20 pm by carie
., often says little; Clarence Thomas never says anything. [read post]