Search for: "Givens v. Miller"
Results 481 - 500
of 2,009
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Feb 2019, 4:42 pm
On February 4, 2019, the California Court of Appeal, Second District issued a 2-1 decision in Ward v. [read post]
5 Feb 2019, 5:06 am
" Here, given that the legislature has classified this type of offense as a misdemeanor, this factor weighs in Miller's favor. [read post]
17 Jan 2019, 11:09 pm
This was a reference in particular to the infamous front page of the Daily Mail which identified the three judges who decided that the government could not trigger Article 50 (and start the Brexit clock) without the consent of Parliament (R (Miller) v Secretary of State for Exiting the European Union [2017] UKSC 5 AKA Miller)Hale noted that Miller is not judge made law by any stretch of imagination. [read post]
17 Jan 2019, 11:06 am
State v. [read post]
14 Jan 2019, 11:59 am
Industry Assn. v. [read post]
11 Jan 2019, 2:50 am
However, following judgment in the earlier Supreme Court case R (on the application of Miller and another) v Secretary of State for Exiting the European Union [2017] UKSC 5, the view taken again was that the UK Act effectively trumped the Scottish Bill, while it awaited the outcome of this constitutional challenge. [read post]
9 Jan 2019, 2:48 pm
Given Justice Neil Gorsuch’s reaction during the recent argument in Timbs v. [read post]
3 Jan 2019, 7:35 am
State v. [read post]
2 Jan 2019, 10:09 am
In EEOC v. [read post]
2 Jan 2019, 6:39 am
Frymier v. [read post]
28 Dec 2018, 4:14 pm
Sierra Club v. [read post]
27 Dec 2018, 6:59 pm
In the 1871 case of United States v. [read post]
20 Dec 2018, 9:22 am
Although I am not a Jew, I am, following Jonathan Miller, “Jew-ish, just not the whole hog. [read post]
20 Dec 2018, 2:04 am
., Mitchell Miller, PC v. [read post]
19 Dec 2018, 8:21 am
The City appeals, and the Second Circuit finds the jury was not properly instructed on both retaliation claims, so the third verdict is now gone, as the Court of Appeals orders a fourth trial.The case is Miller v. [read post]
18 Dec 2018, 9:10 pm
Supreme Court case of Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pennsylvania v. [read post]
17 Dec 2018, 8:47 am
Aaron David Miller will moderate the discussion. [read post]
14 Dec 2018, 5:30 am
By Ronald Miller, J.D. [read post]
11 Dec 2018, 11:18 am
Miller contends that the act of putting an affiant to an election is the suppression of evidence for which his client is entitled to punitive damages. [read post]
10 Dec 2018, 2:26 pm
Miller, 91 F. 129 (6th Cir. 1898). [read post]
