Search for: "Goldstein v Held" Results 481 - 500 of 886
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Oct 2014, 1:30 pm by Maureen Johnston
  Our policy is to include and disclose all cases in which Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys contribute to this blog in various capacities, represents either a party or an amicus in the case, with the exception of the rare cases in which Goldstein & Russell represents the respondent(s) but does not appear on the briefs in the case. [read post]
6 Jun 2018, 4:29 am by Edith Roberts
” At Quartz, Ephrat Livni discusses Dassey v. [read post]
30 Apr 2019, 4:10 am by Edith Roberts
Yesterday a unanimous court ruled in Thacker v. [read post]
31 Oct 2018, 4:11 am by Edith Roberts
In the first case, Frank v. [read post]
14 Aug 2012, 6:56 am by Kiran Bhat
Yesterday the Court granted cert. in Chafin v. [read post]
24 Mar 2011, 12:53 pm by Christa Culver
Note: Goldstein, Howe & Russell, P.C. serves as counsel to the petitioners in the following case, which is listed without regard to its likelihood of being granted.Title: Kaiser Eagle Mountain, Inc. v. [read post]
14 Aug 2018, 4:20 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Services, LLP v Rubin, Fiorella & Friedman LLP, 110 AD3d 426, 427 [1st Dept 2013]; Parametric Capital Mgt., LLC v Lacher, 15 AD3d 301, 302 [1st Dept 2005]; Kahan Jewelry Corp. v Rosenfeld, 295 AD2d 261 [1st Dept 2002]). [read post]
12 Jun 2015, 9:29 am by John Elwood
[Disclosure: Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys contribute to this blog in various capacities, is among the counsel to the petitioner in this case.] [read post]
1 Mar 2013, 6:15 am by Rachel Sachs
” Wednesday’s oral argument in Shelby County v. [read post]
27 Mar 2019, 4:12 am by Edith Roberts
Joel Goldstein has an analysis of the second argument on Monday, in The Dutra Group v. [read post]
21 May 2015, 8:19 am by Maureen Johnston
Virginia instructs and as multiple state and federal courts have held, or at some indeterminate later time, as Texas, Alabama, Florida, and Oklahoma have held; and (2) whether a state court’s reliance on nondiagnostic criteria and lay observation violates this Court’s pronouncements in Atkins and Hall v. [read post]
14 Feb 2019, 3:57 am by Edith Roberts
” At Take Care, Leah Litman asserts that last week’s two stay orders, in June Medical Services and Dunn v. [read post]
15 May 2018, 4:19 am by Edith Roberts
 The justices also held unanimously in United States v. [read post]