Search for: "Government's Response to Motion in Opposition"
Results 481 - 500
of 1,368
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Jun 2013, 1:28 pm
On 4 November 2005, the People filed a Reply Affirmation in support of the motion in limine and an Affirmation in Opposition to defendant's cross-motion. [read post]
3 Feb 2021, 5:31 am
Jurisdiction is governed by the UCCJEA. [read post]
3 Feb 2021, 5:27 am
Jurisdiction is governed by the UCCJEA. [read post]
28 Oct 2013, 11:04 am
The key starting point – MPs handle, in part, the “government” part of the country: remember MPs have constituents to represent, and Cabinet Ministers are the heads of federal departments and MPs in opposition work as shadow “critics” to the these departments. [read post]
4 Mar 2024, 6:51 am
” “Brian Boone, of Alston & Bird in Charlotte, North Carolina, has alleged in a disqualification motion that Motley Rice, in the government cases, used its subpoena powers to obtain confidential documents from his client, OptumRx, and some of them pertain to opioids. [read post]
25 Jul 2007, 12:55 pm
The government filed a response to the Eleventh Circuit motion last week. [read post]
26 Oct 2008, 3:49 pm
" Since this section automatically stops the clock for the preparation of response papers, it make sense that it would also exclude the time for the preparation of the motion itself. [read post]
17 Aug 2011, 6:41 am
Schwarzenegger to articulate the interests of the “government. [read post]
29 May 2020, 4:00 am
It is offensive for the Justice Department to argue that appointed amici—individuals with a long history of civil service both in and out of government—would be less responsible with sensitive materials than any other individual approved to participate in FISA Court proceedings. [read post]
18 May 2020, 11:20 am
For more, read Fox's motion to dismiss, WASHLITE's response, and Fox's reply, which also discuss various other First Amendment arguments. [read post]
5 Mar 2008, 11:24 am
Over the following years a series of amendments were passed, until the most recent enactment went into effect on January 1, 2006, providing that "registered domestic partners shall have the same rights, protections, and benefits, and shall be subject to the same responsibilities, obligations, and duties under law, whether they derive from statutes, administrative regulations, court rules, government policies, common law, or any other provisions or sources of law, as are… [read post]
3 Oct 2022, 10:21 am
Your consultant may also help with: Notices for discovery Demand for Interrogatories Responses to discovery demands Pendente lite motions Opposition papers Cross-motions Replies to opposition papers Stipulations of settlement Proposed statements of disposition Direct Exam Questions Cross-Exam Questions Closing Arguments or Summations Addressing the Elements of a Divorce with Consultants Depending on the type of consultant you work with, there are various… [read post]
17 May 2011, 12:39 pm
The petition in Witt asks the Court to overrule Feres; the Court called for the government’s response, which is due to be filed today. [read post]
9 Feb 2020, 7:17 pm
The modified project, which included changes directly in response to consultations, was ultimately approved. [read post]
20 Mar 2017, 9:01 am
If it does not, we anticipate filing opposition papers in court in coming months. [read post]
8 Jun 2010, 5:43 am
The Guardian had a great editorial about all of this, which sure makes one think: What is going on in the Gulf of Mexico today is an example of Newton's third law of motion: for every action by BP there is an equal and opposite reaction by the federal government in Washington. [read post]
8 Jun 2010, 5:43 am
The Guardian had a great editorial about all of this, which sure makes one think: What is going on in the Gulf of Mexico today is an example of Newton's third law of motion: for every action by BP there is an equal and opposite reaction by the federal government in Washington. [read post]
18 Jan 2012, 12:07 pm
The Brief in Support of its Opposition was also salted by LegalZoom with pejorative terms stating that the Bar had “incorrectly interpret[ed]” the statute governing the process of opposing a Business Court designation (Opp. [read post]
6 Oct 2011, 6:02 pm
The experience in other jurisdictions such as British Columbia and Australia has shown that draft legislation tends to be watered-down in the final product due to strenuous opposition to anti-SLAPP legislation. [read post]
29 Mar 2023, 7:27 pm
" Instead, it wrote the opposite. [read post]
