Search for: "Graves v. State" Results 481 - 500 of 2,533
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Oct 2010, 9:12 am by Abhinav Chandrachud
I do not intend by posing this question to equate the grave ill of dowry in India to corruption. [read post]
6 Jul 2011, 9:06 am by Jon Sands
The only other circuit that touches on this rejected it, and while not outright condemning the procedure, cast grave doubts on its use.U.S. v. [read post]
25 Oct 2009, 5:35 pm
  The motion to enter a consent decree in Northwest Austin Municipal Utility District No. 1 v. [read post]
27 Apr 2023, 10:16 am by Eugene Volokh
Requiring platforms or speakers to consider the laws of all fifty states can gravely burden such entities and therefore interstate commerce. [read post]
2 Apr 2007, 4:43 pm
The practical result of today's ruling in Massachusetts v. [read post]
7 Dec 2022, 2:26 pm by NARF
(Navajo and Hopi Indian Land Settlement Act of 1974)United States v. [read post]
4 Feb 2009, 12:25 am
People v Castellano, 41 AD3d 184, 185; People v Carter, 40 AD3d 1310, 1312). [read post]
18 Apr 2019, 2:22 am by ASAD KHAN
Parties’ submissions Firstly, Mr Robinson submitted that the line of authority beginning with Onibiyo [1996] EWCA Civ 1338 – which established that it was for the Secretary of State to decide whether further submissions constituted a fresh claim giving rise to a right of appeal – did not survive the Supreme Court’s decision in BA (Nigeria) [2009] UKSC 7. [read post]
14 Jul 2023, 1:22 pm by Bona Law PC
Here the District Court–– citing the well-known AT&T acquisition of TimeWarner in 2018 (See United States v. [read post]
10 Jul 2017, 7:00 am by JONATHAN GLASSON QC, MATRIX
In these cases, which certainly include D and V, a proper criminal investigation by the state is required. [read post]
2 Nov 2010, 8:14 pm by cdw
  The Ohio State Supreme Court in State v. [read post]
20 Feb 2022, 5:09 am by Gerard N. Magliocca
A central issue in the case is whether Trump is entitled to official immunity from civil liability under Nixon v. [read post]