Search for: "HALE v. STATE"
Results 481 - 500
of 1,076
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Jul 2015, 1:54 pm
In ZH (Tanzania) [2011] UKSC 4, Baroness Hale said, [33], “This means that they must be considered first. [read post]
22 Jul 2015, 2:34 am
Lord Clarke gave a dissenting judgment, with which Lady Hale agreed. [read post]
20 Jul 2015, 1:00 am
In November 2000, the High Court (Laws LJ and Gibbs J) gave judgment in favour of Mr Bancoult, a Chagos Islander, in granting a High Court order quashing the Immigration Ordinance 1971, s 4; see R (Bancoult) v Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs [2001] QB 1067 (“Bancoult (1)”). [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 12:05 pm
Hall, 440 U.S. 410 (1979), which permits a sovereign State to be haled into the courts of another State without its consent, should be overruled. [read post]
22 Jun 2015, 7:43 am
Thus in Pham v. [read post]
11 Jun 2015, 4:34 am
Lord Sumption, referring to Lord Hoffmann’s speech in Matadeen v Pointu [1999] 1 AC 98 and that of Baroness Hale in Ghaidan v Godin-Mendoza [2004] 2 AC 557, stated that the principle of equality was “not a principle special to the jurisprudence of the European Union. [read post]
28 May 2015, 3:15 pm
In Knight v. [read post]
21 May 2015, 4:43 am
That was on the basis of the House of Lords decision in Din v Wandsworth LBC and the Court of Appeal decision in Dyson v Kerrier DC. [read post]
20 May 2015, 3:30 am
The judgment The leading judgment at the Supreme Court was given jointly by Lady Hale and Lord Toulson. [read post]
15 May 2015, 1:43 am
This definition is lifted directly from Council Directive 98/59/EC on the approximation of laws of the Member States relating to collective redundancies (the “Collective Redundancy Directive”). [read post]
Case Comment: R (ZH and CN) v London Borough of Newham and London Borough of Lewisham [2014] UKSC 62
14 May 2015, 1:59 am
In Hounslow LBC v Powell; Leeds CC v Hall; Birmingham CC v Frisby [2011] UKSC 8; [2011] 2 AC 18; [2011] HLR 23, the decision in Pinnock was held to be of general application whenever a public authority seek possession of a property that constitutes a person’s home. [read post]
13 May 2015, 2:09 am
This was a point of appeal from Kanu v Southwark (our report). [read post]
25 Apr 2015, 11:03 am
Third, the Manual authors state that the doubling argument assumes the “[n]onacceleration of disease. [read post]
22 Apr 2015, 7:34 am
As stated in North v North [2007] EWCA Civ 760 he ‘is not an insurer against all hazards’. [read post]
21 Apr 2015, 2:30 am
The lead judgment was given by Lady Hale (with whom Lord Hodge and Lord Kerr agreed). [read post]
20 Apr 2015, 3:52 am
I had been following this case--Yelp, Inc. v. [read post]
17 Apr 2015, 7:24 am
The entire panel agreed, however, that summary judgment was properly granted on her public policy wrongful discharge claim since she failed to show that a state regulation setting forth baseline recordkeeping requirements for pharmacies mirrored the state whistleblower law or that she ever reported a violation (Hale v. [read post]
17 Apr 2015, 3:35 am
Her predominant legal interest lies in the areas of state crime and international human rights. [read post]
13 Apr 2015, 1:55 am
Lord Reed at [74] – [75] with Lady Hale at [182] and [206]). [read post]
8 Apr 2015, 2:07 am
Lady Hale and Lord Toulson had no such qualms. [read post]
