Search for: "Hales v. Hales"
Results 481 - 500
of 1,469
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Jun 2018, 3:55 pm
Trump v. [read post]
2 Feb 2011, 5:32 am
Indeed Lady Hale even says that the equivalent of factor (vi) for a spouse is whether family life was established knowing of the precariousness of the immigration situation. [read post]
17 Sep 2019, 4:44 pm
Contreras was a partner in the Boston, London and Washington DC offices of the international law firm Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr. [read post]
13 Mar 2013, 5:43 am
Today, following some years of litigation which the IPKat has monitored here, here and here, the UK Supreme Court has given its decision in Schütz v Werit [2013] UKSC 16, A unanimous five-judge court (Lord Neuberger, Lord Walker -- both of whom are former members of the Patents Court -- plus Lady Hale, Lord Mance and Lord Kerr) allowing the appeal and holding that Werit was not infringing Schütz's patent rights by supplying replacing parts. [read post]
24 Mar 2014, 6:32 am
I have to say that there were some words of comfort from Lady Hale in the recent case of Dunhill v Burgin. [read post]
2 Mar 2023, 4:41 am
”But people accused in federal court obtained the right to counsel twenty-five years earlier in Johnson v. [read post]
23 Mar 2012, 1:59 pm
Stuart Hale Co., 1 F.3d 611, 618 (7th Cir. 1993). [read post]
4 Jul 2011, 8:53 am
Lady Hale rejected the “exceptional circumstances” approach. [read post]
29 Sep 2010, 3:05 pm
Hale v. [read post]
15 Oct 2018, 7:34 am
Nonetheless, as Lady Hale points out, this cake’s message did implicate these bakers’ consciences. [read post]
18 Oct 2011, 8:44 am
Lady Hale adopted a different approach, noting that the ECtHR had traditionally drawn a distinction between the positive (allowing family reunion) and negative (not expelling a family member) aspects of Article 8. [read post]
18 Oct 2011, 8:44 am
Lady Hale adopted a different approach, noting that the ECtHR had traditionally drawn a distinction between the positive (allowing family reunion) and negative (not expelling a family member) aspects of Article 8. [read post]
21 Apr 2016, 11:12 am
The panel of five justices (Lord Neuberger, Lady Hale, Lords Mance, Reed and Toulson) reserved its decision until a later date and said the injunction in the case would remain in place in the meantime. [read post]
2 May 2013, 10:51 am
While stationed in Germany in 2006, he married respondent Lynne Hales Chafin, a citizen of the United Kingdom. [read post]
17 Nov 2014, 7:03 am
Lord Reed gave a concurring judgment, with which Lady Hale and Lord Clarke agreed. [read post]
1 Aug 2017, 1:05 am
Lord Wilson gives the lead majority judgment, with which Lady Hale, Lord Kerr and Lord Carnwath agree. [read post]
3 May 2017, 8:09 am
Lady Hale and Lords Wilson, Carnwath, Hodge and Toulson recently heard these appeals and reserved judgment on the issue whether section 94B of the Nationality, Immigration and Asylum Act 2002 complies with the procedural and substantive protections under ECHR, article 8. [read post]
24 Aug 2012, 1:30 am
Hale's proposition was relatively uncontroversial throughout the Commonwealth for several centuries, although several English judges did express some reservations about it over the years; for instance, in R v Clarence (1889) 22 QBD 23. [read post]
24 Aug 2012, 1:30 am
Hale's proposition was relatively uncontroversial throughout the Commonwealth for several centuries, although several English judges did express some reservations about it over the years; for instance, in R v Clarence (1889) 22 QBD 23. [read post]
28 Nov 2013, 6:27 am
Lady Hale provided a supporting judgment in which she emphasised the importance of the law being seen as fair, consistent and logical. [read post]
