Search for: "Harrison v State" Results 481 - 500 of 807
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Jun 2007, 6:56 am
Harrison, 61 M.J. 70 (C.A.A.F. 2005) (summary disposition) (granting habeas petition to compel United States to comply with the Army Court of Criminal Appeals' holding) [Category 3]Lucero v. [read post]
17 Mar 2015, 7:19 pm by Joy Waltemath
In issuing this opinion, the state high court: (1) clarified that state courts should follow longstanding federal court guidance in Faragher v. [read post]
6 May 2022, 9:54 am by Eric S. Solotoff
Harrison, the Appellate Division decided the Monynihan should be given retroactive effect. [read post]
22 Mar 2010, 8:59 am
NO-FAULT – PROOF OF MAILING – MEDICAL NECESSITY Right Aid Diagnostic Medicine, P.C. a/a/o Tarshia Harrison v. [read post]
28 Jan 2011, 2:40 pm by Jon McLaughlin
"[18]   The Goslin court not only reversed the trial court, but it instructed the trial court to allow the petitioner to amend her petition since the record was absent of any representation regarding her residence at the time of filing.[19]  Also on point is federal case law from within our State.[20] In Davis v Davis, 638 F Supp 862 (ND Ill 1986), the petitioner had not been a resident of Illinois for 90 days preceding the filing of her petition. [read post]
20 Nov 2019, 9:51 am by Harrison Notkin
For more information on the Miglin Principles please refer to Miglin v. [read post]
20 Nov 2019, 9:51 am by Harrison Notkin
For more information on the Miglin Principles please refer to Miglin v. [read post]
8 Nov 2015, 9:01 pm
The case now returns to the federal court for additional proceedings.Land and Mineral Rights Changed Multiple TimesA mining company split the surface and mineral rights on this Harrison County land in 1958. [read post]
29 Oct 2009, 1:05 pm by Tobias Thienel
Secretary of State for Defence [2008] EWHC 3098 (Admin), paras 89 et seq, and followed obiter in R (Al-Saadoon) v. [read post]
10 Jun 2008, 12:09 am
Town of Harrison (1997) -- dormant Commerce ClauseMorse v. [read post]