Search for: "Holt v. Holt" Results 481 - 500 of 581
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Jun 2010, 11:12 am
School Dist., 52 NY2d 625.In Holt the Court of Appeals said that letters in an employee's personnel file commenting on that employee's conduct or performance that the employer found unsatisfactory did not constitute discipline. [read post]
7 Jun 2010, 2:27 pm by K&L Gates
The court referenced the four elements for valid corporate acknowledgement set forth in Ben Holt Industries, Inc. v. [read post]
19 May 2010, 4:49 am by Stephen Page
By virtue of Section 32DA of the Acts Interpretation Act 1954 :-(i) “In an Act, a reference to a de facto partner is a reference to either one of two persons who are living together as a couple on a genuine domestic basis who are not married to each other or related by family;(v) For sub-section (1) – (a) the gender of the persons is not relevant…. [read post]
26 Apr 2010, 4:48 am by Broc Romanek
In fact, this guidance may very well have been issued as a result of those actions, particularly SEC v. [read post]
12 Apr 2010, 10:18 am by Goldberg Segalla LLP
Employers Reinsurance Corporation  Download Oriska v All Staffing  Download Pendergest-Holt v. [read post]
31 Mar 2010, 11:19 am
McDaniel, Case Western Reserve University, “‘Her house was no longer hers entirely:’ Legal Classification and the Law of Intestacy in Virginia Woolf’s Orlando”Katherine Gilbert, Drury University, “‘There is no private life which has not been determined by a wider public life:’ George Eliot’s Felix Holt (1866)” 10:45-11:00 Break Coffee/Tea SECOND SET OF PANELS 11:00-12:15 Panel 1: Literature, Law and Shakespeare’s Measure for… [read post]
1 Mar 2010, 3:13 am
”In Holt v Board of Education, 52 N.Y.2d 625, the Court of Appeals said that performance evaluations and letters of criticism placed in the employee’s personnel file were not “disciplinary penalties” and thus could be placed there without having to first hold a disciplinary proceeding.In contrast, where “constructive criticism” imposed, in effect, a penalty, it constitutes disciplinary action and such action has been found to serve to frustrate… [read post]
24 Feb 2010, 2:29 am by traceydennis
Pitt and Another v Holt and Another Chancery Division “A receiver appointed under the Mental Health Act 1983 by the Court of Protection was entitled to set aside a settlement made by her, as receiver for her late husband, where the inheritance tax position had not been taken into account when the settlement was established. [read post]