Search for: "INFORRM"
Results 481 - 500
of 889
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Sep 2018, 4:09 pm
A Response to the Cairncross Review’s Call for Evidence (via Inforrm’s blog). [read post]
5 Feb 2012, 4:08 pm
[Inforrm Note: see Brian Cathcart's post on this point - "Hacking a lost detail"] Even if the PCC had missed the judge’s remarks, then it only needed to look at Mulcaire’s plea. [read post]
9 Jan 2020, 4:07 pm
This remains a matter of doubt, given the apparent paucity of data in the last published figures and a question mark over their completeness, as noted by the Inforrm blog here and here. [read post]
10 Aug 2014, 5:20 pm
The top 5 posts on Inforrm this week were Facebook’s Community Standards: Severed heads are okay, but nipples are bad (unless accompanied by a baby) – Gideon Benaim and Jon Oakley Law and Media Round Up – 4 August 2014 Case Law: PNM v Times Newspapers, Open justice and reporting information about a suspect – Hugh Tomlinson QC The Sun just keeps getting it wrong on human rights – Adam Wagner Case Law: R (T) v Secretary of State for the Home… [read post]
2 Aug 2015, 4:50 pm
There was a 5RB case comment and will have an Inforrm case comment shortly along with a post on the procedural points arising from the decision. [read post]
19 Jan 2015, 1:49 am
Dan’s posting on the Court of Appeal judgment (written before he was instructed by the Interveners) for Inforrm’s Blog is here. [read post]
29 Jul 2024, 4:32 pm
On Inforrm’s analysis of issued claims in the Media and Communications list in 2023 – based on data derived from HM Courts and Tribunals E-Filing Service – the 2023 figure for issue defamation claims was 111 (and the 2022 figure 130). [read post]
25 May 2011, 5:47 pm
In short, the case is the latest in the long-running News of the World phone hacking affair (see this post and this one on Inforrm’s Blog for the latest developments). [read post]
25 Oct 2015, 4:30 am
There is already an excellent summary of the by Brigit Morris is on Inforrm’s Blog here, but the focus of this post is the award of damages in the UK in circumstances where the claimant has a ‘bad reputation’ that can be adduced by the defendant. [read post]
30 Nov 2010, 4:38 am
We have recently added a list of “Law and Media Tweets” to the right hand side of the Inforrm home page and we would like to draw the attention of readers unfamiliar with Twitter to some of these. [read post]
9 May 2011, 3:54 am
Joshua Rozenberg, the Garrulous Law blog, Carl Gardner and Inforrm have cut through some of the nonsense, but expect more to come this week with Tuesday’s judgment in Max Mosley’s request that the European Court of Human Rights impose a requirement on journalists to inform the subjects of stories before they publish private information about them. [read post]
22 Mar 2011, 2:29 am
A good starting point for this conversation is the legal bloggers, who generally speaking seek to bring the public closer to the legal system through modern technology, and have been predictably enthusiastic about Neuberger’s speech: see Meeja Law, UKSC Blog, Halsbury’s Law Exchange, Inforrm, ObiterJ, Charon QC and the UCL Constitutional Unit which called my own response “almost gushing“. [read post]
21 Jan 2017, 9:12 am
Less overtly campaign-orientated reports published after the consultation closed included: The Press Gazette: ‘Government may have to adopt section 40 compromise with benefits for impress but no penalties for the rest’ The Times summarizing the number and type of responses received by the consultation with ‘140,000 give views on press regulation’ Inforrm with ‘Don’t believe what you read: Section 40 will protect the local press not kill it’… [read post]
7 Apr 2011, 4:13 am
Inforrm encourages readers to make submissions to the Committee and to send copies to us – to be included on a special section of the blog – see the right hand column. [read post]
25 May 2021, 3:03 pm
Mr Mosley wrote pieces for Inforrm on several occasions including Data Protection and Press Bullying: A response Opinion: “Role models and hypocrites” Max Mosley: Why I think that the Leveson model makes sense for everyone Opinion: “Prior notification in privacy cases – A response to Andrew Scott” [read post]
30 Jul 2012, 5:12 pm
As Professor Matthew Ricketson, a journalist and academic who assisted Judge Finkelstein, noted on Inforrm, the report was systematically misrepresented and distorted by the Australian media. [read post]
27 Aug 2016, 4:08 pm
Gmail even analyses the data in emails sent to Gmail users from non Gmail account holders to target ads (see my Inforrm post on May 2014). [read post]
18 Dec 2011, 4:11 pm
On Inforrm, Professor Brian Cathcart argued that the press are “lashing out like cornered animals“. [read post]
31 Oct 2021, 5:45 pm
Marcus Carter and Ben Egliston consider whether this is a genuine bid to set the company on course for the future of computing, or merely a PR exercise, for Inforrm this week. [read post]
26 Jul 2023, 8:53 am
We had an Inforrm case comment on the decision. [read post]
