Search for: "In Re Medical Review Panel"
Results 481 - 500
of 893
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Jun 2015, 2:11 pm
” The FDA also reminded Amarin that it is “currently engaged in a comprehensive review of its regulations and guidance documents regarding manufacturer’s dissemination of information regarding their medical products, and new guidance will be forthcoming. [read post]
9 Jun 2015, 5:00 am
University of Texas at Austin 14-981Issue: Whether the Fifth Circuit’s re-endorsement of the University of Texas at Austin’s use of racial preferences in undergraduate admissions decisions can be sustained under this Court’s decisions interpreting the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment, including Fisher v. [read post]
5 Jun 2015, 7:32 am
But on appeal, a divided panel of the Eleventh Circuit granted relief. [read post]
4 Jun 2015, 1:47 pm
After reading Holly's review, I wished I would have gotten an invitation. [read post]
29 May 2015, 2:24 pm
John Elwood reviews Tuesday’s relisted cases. [read post]
26 May 2015, 8:19 am
Evolving piece was in things like cars, medical devices. [read post]
24 May 2015, 1:08 pm
Although these CT scans are “low dose,” they’re not “no dose. [read post]
1 May 2015, 9:19 am
A divided panel of the D.C. [read post]
30 Apr 2015, 8:00 am
In re W.W., 97 Ill.2d at 57. [read post]
28 Apr 2015, 8:00 am
” The appeals panel found that Dr. [read post]
21 Apr 2015, 5:28 pm
During oral argument on March 3, 2015, the Third Circuit panel questioned whether the unfairness prong covered nonfraudulent negligent cybersecurity conduct and whether the FTC could directly bring an action in court without first issuing cybersecurity rules through rulemaking or adjudication. [read post]
14 Apr 2015, 3:54 am
A recent California Workers' Compensation Appeals Board panel decision may cause a bit of tumult in the already contentious forum of Independent Medical Review.In an order granting reconsideration by applicant Diane Garibay-Jimenez, Commissioners Rick Dietrich, Deidra Lowe and Cristine Gondak found that not only is it the employer/administrator's sole responsibility to make sure that IMR is provided with all relevant medical records (in a timely fashion) but that… [read post]
29 Mar 2015, 10:47 am
If you’re looking for a model of how to deprive people of their rights after they’ve suffered from medical malpractice, go to Wisconsin. [read post]
29 Mar 2015, 8:22 am
”The three-justice panel begins with a review of the last opinion’s findings. [read post]
25 Mar 2015, 4:27 pm
The agency has also considered her something of a bright light, using her on panels and presentations. [read post]
13 Mar 2015, 12:04 pm
See In re D. [read post]
13 Mar 2015, 12:04 pm
PANEL: LIVINGSTON, C.J.; DAUPHINOT and McCOY, JJ. [read post]
9 Mar 2015, 7:48 am
You’re right. [read post]
6 Mar 2015, 12:53 pm
Accordingly, we grant the petition for review in this case, and without hearing oral argument, TEX. [read post]
24 Feb 2015, 5:00 am
The court noted that even "[a]ssuming arguendo that the records constitute expert reports, none of the records state, within a reasonable degree of medical certainty" that the Plaintiff's injuries were the result of the medical malpractice alleged.While the court noted that the Plaintiff need not utilize "magic words," the use of terms of causation such as "most likely" or "in all likelihood" were not sufficient.As stated the… [read post]
