Search for: "In Re Owens" Results 481 - 500 of 1,014
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Apr 2009, 3:22 am
If Benesch is questionable, the result in Owens v. [read post]
10 Mar 2010, 7:32 am by Steve Hall
The ruling is troubling to Owens; for starters, it doesn't make sense that Skinner could have waived his right to testing years before the law even existed. [read post]
18 Apr 2022, 4:21 am by SHG
The circuit, by Chief Judge Priscilla Owen, held this was no big deal. [read post]
15 May 2012, 7:36 am by Jeralyn
Witness re-interviews conducted after they were exposed to the media reports and aligned themselves with one side or the other, are not great evidence. [read post]
27 Apr 2010, 4:30 am by Jim Dedman
A products liability professor, she co-authored the products liability treatise, Owen, Madden and Davis on Products Liability. [read post]
7 Sep 2016, 5:00 am by Patricia Klusmeyer
This case demonstrates that the SEC has expanded its views on the use of back-tested performance in marketing and advertising materials by adding additional parameters not seen in prior SEC enforcement actions involving back-tested performance data such as In re Schield Management Company, In re Meridian Investment Management Corp., In re LBS Capital Management, Inc., and In re Patricia Owen-Michel. [read post]
26 Apr 2007, 5:49 pm
You’re now before Kevin Castel instead of Richard Owen. [read post]
7 Sep 2016, 5:00 am by Patricia Klusmeyer
This case demonstrates that the SEC has expanded its views on the use of back-tested performance in marketing and advertising materials by adding additional parameters not seen in prior SEC enforcement actions involving back-tested performance data such as In re Schield Management Company, In re Meridian Investment Management Corp., In re LBS Capital Management, Inc., and In re Patricia Owen-Michel. [read post]
29 Mar 2009, 7:17 pm
As I detailed above, Patrick Byrne told Fox News, "We're profitable. [read post]
28 Jan 2016, 7:12 am by Gene Killian
  Does the “gap” get assessed to the policyholder for purposes of an Owens-Illinois allocation? [read post]
24 Aug 2012, 7:34 am by Gritsforbreakfast
More recently, the parole board has been releasing such offenders a year or two before the end of their term so they'll be under supervision during the period when they're most likely to re-offend. [read post]