Search for: "In re Brady" Results 481 - 500 of 965
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Aug 2009, 8:35 pm
I should have grabbed Chester Taylor as a handcuff for Peterson.As for the Redskins, if you're going to be a homer with any pick, why not at DST? [read post]
28 Sep 2011, 3:38 am by Russ Bensing
You’re representing a defendant who was involved in a bar fight that went seriously bad. [read post]
26 Feb 2008, 11:38 pm
"When they can't find a job, a place to stay, when they can't be near their family, when their lives become unstable, some data has shown they're more likely to re-offend. [read post]
28 Dec 2017, 5:16 am by SHG
What prevents a prosecutor from playing “hide the Brady” with impunity? [read post]
20 Feb 2012, 10:40 am by Gritsforbreakfast
We sent her trial testimony and other evidence to her for her to re-review then Mike spoke to her. [read post]
7 May 2010, 1:09 pm by Erin Miller
  While much of this ground is familiar to criminal procedure scholars, it is worth re-examining in light of Justice Stevens’ imminent departure from the Court. [read post]
13 Apr 2021, 7:22 am by Jeremy Shur
While defendants are supposed to be given access to information about the flaws of human witnesses pursuant to the Supreme Court’s decision in Brady v. [read post]
17 Apr 2014, 5:10 am by SHG
Yet again, we’re stuck in “but for video” mode. [read post]
17 Apr 2024, 9:06 am by Phil Dixon
Given the confluence of cases in which the Eastern District of North Carolina United States Attorney’s Office has breached its discovery standards, it appears a re-evaluation [of its discovery standards] is in order. [read post]
1 Sep 2011, 3:42 am by Russ Bensing
  In 1988, the state botched D’Ambrosio’s trial by violating Brady v. [read post]
26 Dec 2011, 8:20 am by Gritsforbreakfast
How about John Bradley losing re-election, would that democratic rebuke be enough? [read post]
14 Mar 2008, 5:47 pm
Frankly, the DOJ's analysis stands Brady on its head. [read post]
8 Nov 2023, 6:53 am by John Elwood
Maryland; and (2) whether suppressed impeachment evidence of the state’s key witness is per se non-material under Brady because that witness’ credibility had been otherwise impeached at trial. [read post]
27 Oct 2023, 7:12 am by John Elwood
Brownback, 22-912 Issue: Whether the Federal Tort Claims Act’s judgment bar, which this court has repeatedly said functions in much the same way as the common-law doctrine of res judicata, nevertheless operates to bar claims brought together in the same action. [read post]
5 Jul 2012, 3:48 am by Russ Bensing
  (By the way, if you’re wondering what happened to the weekly 8th District date, it’s right under this. [read post]
4 Jun 2014, 9:17 am by Simon Chester
Translated by Tom Brady as <> Clément GASCON, « Les récents développements en matière de clauses restrictives d’emploi », dans Service de la formation permanente du Barreau du Québec, Développements récents en droit du travail, Cowansville, Éditions Yvon Blais, 1992. ; Clément GASCON et Claire VACHON, « Grandeurs et misères de l’obligation de loyauté du… [read post]