Search for: "In re C. F. S."
Results 481 - 500
of 6,781
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Jul 2010, 2:59 am
"[1] A perfect case in point--and the thing that got me right back to the business of criticizing--is the recent opinion-piece, Giving an F to New York's Restaurant Grading System, by Josh Ozersky published online at Time.com.[2] In the piece, Ozersky decries the posting of letter grades, based on a restaurant's most recent health inspection, as being akin to Hester Prynne "being...shamed for all the world to see. [read post]
7 Mar 2012, 4:59 am
Maynard, 615 F.3d 544 (D.C. [read post]
10 Jun 2014, 9:01 pm
” In re Hubbell, 709 F.3d 1140, 1145 (Fed. [read post]
24 May 2022, 8:42 am
L’avis du Ministère fait également référence à la contrainte. [read post]
24 Oct 2017, 9:03 am
Chanza, burla; 2. f. [read post]
21 Apr 2021, 12:30 pm
Since buildings are always going up and undergoing change, it’s not uncommon to find yourself walking beneath sidewalk shelters for scaffolds while you’re on your way to work. [read post]
15 Nov 2014, 12:21 pm
If the person is eligible under Section 1170.18(f), the court shall grant the petition. [read post]
2 Mar 2017, 11:33 am
In re DSC, Ltd., 486 F.3d 940, 944 (6th Cir. 2007). [read post]
14 Oct 2016, 12:33 pm
Erin F. [read post]
8 Jan 2014, 10:03 am
Guzzo, 719 F.3d at 109. [read post]
2 May 2007, 5:21 am
In re Calvin S., 2007 Cal. [read post]
10 Jan 2012, 12:16 pm
C & F Svcs., 290 Ga.App. 305, 307–308(2), 659 S.E.2d 707 (2008).Although the trial court’s first order noted that Meeks was liable for conversion of the furniture, the record shows that at the bench trial, the value of the converted furniture was given as “no more than $200.00,” with no value at all assigned to a never-recovered lawn mower. [read post]
4 Jul 2020, 5:52 pm
C. [read post]
12 Mar 2020, 7:23 am
That question has been answered by the Tenth Circuit in In re Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 395 F.3d 1177 (10th Cir. 2005), and the Illinois Appellate Court in Robinson v. [read post]
9 Sep 2014, 1:05 am
§ 1125(c)(1)) dozens of Disney’s federal registered trade marks for Mickey Mouse (the "Mickey Marks"). [read post]
1 Jun 2020, 7:20 am
Plutôt que de retarder indéfiniment les procès, la Cour fédérale fera appel à la technologie pour trancher les dossiers de la manière la plus efficace possible. [read post]
14 May 2013, 11:47 am
The jury determined that“[c]laims 1 to 7 and 9 of [Metso’s] ’618 patent [we]re notinvalid as obvious under 35 U.S.C. [read post]
20 Mar 2010, 1:41 pm
" The case law cited in support of the FP are In re Keller, 642 F.2d 413, 208 USPQ 871 (CCPA 1981); and In re Merck & Co., 800 F.2d 1091, 231 USPQ 375 (Fed. [read post]
15 Feb 2015, 9:48 am
C (Def. [read post]
6 Nov 2021, 6:00 am
Res. 441). [read post]
