Search for: "In re Case"
Results 481 - 500
of 164,570
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Mar 2010, 7:50 am
I have been wanting to post about the decision early last month in In re Lehman Brothers ERISA Litigation, in which the Southern District of New York dismissed ERISA stock drop claims against a number of officers and a named fiduciary, but, as it turns out, I have been too busy using the decision for my own purposes in my own practice to find time to post about it. [read post]
31 Oct 2008, 1:33 pm
The decision of In re Bilski focuses on a patent application filed in 1997 that claims a method for hedging risk in the field of commodities trading. [read post]
15 Sep 2010, 6:07 pm
"Officials petition for re-hearing in UHP crosses case": The Deseret News has an update that begins, "A number of state officials are asking the 10th Circuit Court of Appeals to re-consider its decision on the use of crosses to commemorate fallen officers from the Utah Highway Patrol. [read post]
3 Jun 2016, 10:36 am
At trial, the plaintiff relied on the doctrine of res ipsa loquitur to establish a prima facie case of negligence. [read post]
27 Aug 2020, 10:24 am
As a result, the court remanded the case so the defendant could be re-sentenced. [read post]
20 Apr 2009, 6:19 am
We're otherwise removing this one from the tracker list, and we're done. [read post]
27 Jan 2014, 5:00 am
In re Lazaria C.R.H. [read post]
22 Mar 2022, 8:14 am
Case date: 02 February 2022 Case number: No. 21-1496 Court: United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit A full summary of this case has been published on Kluwer IP Law. [read post]
24 May 2021, 8:27 am
The case, United States v. [read post]
15 Dec 2010, 1:21 pm
By Jason Rantanen In re Vistaprint Ltd. [read post]
14 Mar 2022, 11:35 am
Related Cases: Uniloc v. [read post]
5 Apr 2013, 9:30 am
The CAFC in In re Morsa expounded on the prior enablement case In re Antor Media Corp., 689 F.3d 1282,1287 (Fed. [read post]
5 Mar 2024, 7:28 am
McCain, decided on the issue of res judicata. [read post]
10 Sep 2020, 1:00 am
In the case Lageman v. [read post]
29 May 2018, 12:18 pm
Why on earth a dentist in a large dental practice would subject his patients to potential disease and infection by re-using dental instruments which were designed and sold for single-use is anyone’s guess. [read post]
29 May 2018, 12:18 pm
Why on earth a dentist in a large dental practice would subject his patients to potential disease and infection by re-using dental instruments which were designed and sold for single-use is anyone’s guess. [read post]
18 Jun 2008, 1:06 pm
The Lords' judgment in the case of In Re P (Northern Ireland) is an important one on the relationship between the UK courts applying the Human Rights Act 1998 on the one hand, and the European Court of Human Rights applying the European Convention on Human Rights on the other. [read post]
30 Jul 2018, 4:00 am
When the defendant sought rehearing, Judge Wardlaw was assigned to the case in Judge Reinhardt's place, but he signed the original opinion, which turned out to be one of his last. [read post]
30 Jul 2018, 4:00 am
When the defendant sought rehearing, Judge Wardlaw was assigned to the case in Judge Reinhardt's place, but he signed the original opinion, which turned out to be one of his last. [read post]
3 Feb 2009, 5:06 pm
Today, the Supreme Court scheduled the oral argument in In re Tobacco II Cases, no. [read post]
