Search for: "In re the Dependency of R. B." Results 481 - 500 of 1,884
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Jun 2021, 5:01 am by Kluwer Patent blogger
When there was no decision in January, there were many rumours it could come out anytime, but we’re in June now and we’re still waiting. [read post]
31 Mar 2015, 2:21 pm
The Examiner used the same rationale for dependent claim 37, which recited "the client device further subscribing to ... [read post]
31 Mar 2015, 2:20 pm
The Examiner used the same rationale for dependent claim 37, which recited "the client device further subscribing to ... [read post]
25 Feb 2019, 1:49 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
  There is space for competition among policies, but that only works if that’s evident to consumers—if people know what they’re buying, and if there is actual competition. [read post]
6 Sep 2011, 9:41 am by Venkat
Venkat starts us off:] In re Robert Edward Forchion, Jr., 2011 WL 3834929 (Ca. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 1:23 pm by WIMS
We will re-apply for a Presidential Permit and expect a new application would be processed in an expedited manner to allow for an in-service date of late 2014. [read post]
14 Mar 2016, 3:44 pm by Eugene Volokh
(Much depends, of course, on the circumstances, including how the speaker intended his statement to be understood, and how reasonable listeners would have understood it.) b. [read post]
17 Sep 2021, 5:38 pm by Russell Knight
R. 2(b)(5) “[A]ll documents in civil cases shall be electronically filed with the clerk of court using an electronic filing system approved by the Supreme Court of Illinois. [read post]
19 Oct 2021, 11:54 pm by Roel van Woudenberg
The patent in suit had been opposed pursuant to Article 100(a) EPC for lack of novelty (Article 54 EPC) and lack of inventive step (Article 56 EPC), Article 100(b) EPC for insufficiency of disclosure (Article 83 EPC), and Article 100(c) EPC for added matter (Article 123(2) EPC and Article 76(1) EPC).III. [read post]
9 Sep 2009, 11:23 am by Jonathan Pink
Sometimes true, depending on things I'm not really sure about. [read post]
13 May 2020, 12:33 pm by Verushka Reddy
However, s157(4)(b) provides that a certificate of outcome is sufficient proof that an attempt has been made to conciliate a dispute. [read post]
24 Mar 2017, 5:08 pm by Kelly Phillips Erb
For more Taxes A to Z, check out: A is for Affordable Care Act Reporting B is for Back Pay C is for Canceled Debt D is for Dependents E is for Eligible Rollover Distributions F is for Fat Finger Error G is for GI Bill [read post]