Search for: "In the Matter of Recovery I, Inc." Results 481 - 500 of 1,066
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Sep 2013, 7:38 am by Florian Mueller
What exposes his permissive agenda is the passage on page 28 in which he disagrees with Judge Posner, or at least with the way he, I believe, misunderstands Judge Posner:"Some commentators and some courts reason that -- as a matter of contract -- the F/RAND commitment is an agreement that damages are adequate compensation for infringement and therefore an injunction should not be granted under the Supreme Court's standard in eBay Inc. et al. v. [read post]
28 Dec 2007, 10:53 am
In addition, I write to express my position on one preliminary matter addressed by the majority. [read post]
25 Jun 2014, 12:49 pm by Richard Booth
 If I buy a stock at $20 because I think it is worth $30 and then the stock falls to $10 when new information arrives, I may still think it is a good buy, but I would rather have bought at $10. [read post]
23 Jun 2011, 1:19 pm by Dan Parlow
In my own experience, and in that of other litigators I have spoken with on this matter,  settlements of entire cases often follow after partial settlements are made, even if not yet disclosed. [read post]
23 Jun 2011, 1:19 pm by Dan Parlow
In my own experience, and in that of other litigators I have spoken with on this matter,  settlements of entire cases often follow after partial settlements are made, even if not yet disclosed. [read post]
The fact of the matter is that I was doing everything right but because of someone else’s negligence, a very serious accident could have taken place. [read post]
12 Jun 2007, 9:53 am
NCT Group, Inc., 863 A.2d 772, 795-96 (2004). [read post]
20 Apr 2010, 6:32 am
IF AN APPRAISAL IS SO ORDERED, IT SHALL BE LIMITED TO A DETERMI- 19 NATION OF ACTUAL CASH VALUE AND/OR REPLACEMENT COST, OR THE AMOUNT OF EXPLANATION--Matter in ITALICS (underscored) is new; matter in brackets [ ] is old law to be omitted. [read post]
18 May 2009, 5:00 am
  I imagine it was included as a compromise to satisfy legislators opposed to judicial interference with traditional corporate majority rule. [read post]