Search for: "In the Matter of the Civil Commitment of: T. L. S." Results 481 - 500 of 768
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Sep 2014, 6:57 am
This is unconstitutional, given modern First Amendment precedents and our nation’s and Minnesota’s commitment to the freedom of speech. [read post]
10 Sep 2014, 8:35 am
But on the main divisive matters, prolonged negotiations seemed only to harden the position of each side rather than facilitating compromise. [read post]
30 Aug 2014, 2:40 pm by Stephen Bilkis
In response, the People argued that defendant had committed a residential burglary, which as a matter of law constitutes a violent felony offense. [read post]
27 Jul 2014, 9:03 am by Schachtman
  In litigating scientific issues, lawyers and judges will necessarily have to engage with substantive matters. [read post]
8 Jul 2014, 9:35 am
Representatives of the civil society coalition were euphoric, though several NGOs criticized the exclusion of national companies.[6] China’s explanation of its vote was no rousing endorsement. [read post]
25 Jun 2014, 2:00 pm by Maureen Johnston
Federal Communications Commission’s outdated rationale for diminishing the First Amendment protection of broadcasters; (2) whether, in light of the Court’s decision in Citizens United v. [read post]
25 Jun 2014, 11:13 am by Robert Chesney
Professor Jeff Kahn (SMU Law, also visiting at W&L Law) writes in with the following guest post on yesterday’s no-fly list decision. [read post]
4 Jun 2014, 6:36 am
In effect this is a duty of proactive disclosure outside of Section 4(1) of the RTI Act and its compliance is not dependent upon a stimulation received from any citizen in the form of a formal RTI application under Section 6(1).[3] The NDA Government needs to demonstrate its commitment to transparency and accountability by complying with the requirements of the RTI Act. [read post]
14 Apr 2014, 8:37 am by Jen Lynch and Jennifer Lynch
This doesn’t seem to matter much to the FBI—the Bureau notes that because “this is an investigative search and caveats will be prevalent on the return detailing that the [non-FBI] agency is responsible for determining the identity of the subject, there should be NO legal issues. [read post]