Search for: "Internet Association, et al." Results 481 - 500 of 701
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Mar 2011, 6:47 pm by Marie Louise
(IP finance) United States US Patents – Decisions CAFC: In re Katz (part 2): Indefiniteness of computer processes (Patently-O) CAFC: Altair illustrates how to win by losing: Altair v Leddynamics (IPBiz) District Court E D Wisconsin: In Re Seagate does not dictate standard for pleading willful infringement claim: Milwaukee Electric Tool Corporation, et. al. v. [read post]
4 Mar 2011, 9:11 am by Christa Culver
Certiorari stage documents:Opinion below (9th Circuit)Petition for certiorariBrief in oppositionPetitioners' replyAmicus brief of former SEC Commissioners et al.Amicus brief of the Association of Private Sector Colleges and UniversitiesAmicus brief of the National Association of Manufacturers Title: National Union Fire Insurance Co. v. [read post]
1 Mar 2011, 1:34 pm by John Elwood
§  Petitioners’ reply §  Amicus brief of Economists et al. [read post]
15 Feb 2011, 2:34 pm by Howard Knopf
It seems that “education” has become something of an “E” word in Bill C-32.Despite the orchestrated and inaccurate histrionics and hysteria of Access Copyright et al (e.g. see above for today's latest installment),  the inclusion of the word “education” in and of itself will clearly cause no harm to anyone, since any dealing for the purpose of “education” (whatever that may mean) must also pass the Supreme Court of… [read post]
8 Feb 2011, 10:47 am
Wyndham et al.) that suggests that the email list kept by HOAs and Condos must be provided to owners, or at least the alternative of having the HOA send out an ownner's communication via email, if it uses the list to communicate with owners. [read post]
7 Feb 2011, 5:56 pm by Hedge Fund Lawyer
  CPOs must disclose amounts of income and fees associated with investments in investment partnerships that exceed five percent of the commodity pool’s net assets. [read post]
11 Jan 2011, 8:33 am by Venkat
As the certification was provisional and preliminary to final approval, denial of final approval abrogates provisional class certification and the interim appointment of Kamber et al as class counsel. [read post]
10 Jan 2011, 3:20 am by Kelly
(Chicago IP Litigation Blog) N D Ohio: Damages award exceeding stipulated 4% royalty rate was not excessive: Bendix Commercial Vehicle Systems LLC, et. al. v. [read post]
13 Dec 2010, 10:37 am by Eric
The Brotman et al brief makes a "least cost avoider" argument, which to me points in favor of YouTube. [read post]