Search for: "JOINES v. UNITED STATES" Results 481 - 500 of 11,341
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Aug 2023, 6:05 am by Santiago Stocker
In some countries, Fulanis are motivated to join jihadist groups after experiencing state-sponsored violence (carried out by state forces, paramilitaries, and foreign mercenaries), while also being drawn to their invocation of potent historical narratives. [read post]
9 Aug 2023, 10:26 am by Kevin LaCroix
Indeed, in McDonald’s II, the court reached back before Caremark to the 1963 Delaware Supreme Court decision in Graham v. [read post]
8 Aug 2023, 2:01 pm by Laurence H. Tribe
Among other things, it completely disregards the role of the Electoral Count Act – and, even more fundamentally, of Article II of the Constitution in empowering Congress to set the “Time of chusing the Electors, and the Day on which they shall give their Votes, which Day shall be the same throughout the United States. [read post]
7 Aug 2023, 4:51 am
JOIN TODAY -- FREE MEMBERSHIP   Circle Game in Federal Courts Has Lawsuit Sent Back to FINRA's Barred DoorDaniel Callahan, et al., Plaintiffs, v. [read post]
3 Aug 2023, 4:49 am by Ralf Michaels
This is not unproblematic: the European Union undertakes here the same unilateralism that it used to criticize when previously done by the United States, with the Helms/Burton Act as the most prominent example. [read post]
3 Aug 2023, 4:00 am by Michael C. Dorf
" Yet Justice Kagan joined Justice Sotomayor's Dubin opinion in full. [read post]
31 Jul 2023, 4:47 pm by INFORRM
On the other hand, the Colorado restriction might not survive the application of United States v United Foods, Inc 533 US 405 (2001), where obligations upon fresh mushroom handlers pay assessments used primarily to fund advertisements promoting mushroom sales did not survive Central Hudson scrutiny as mediated through Glickman v Wileman Brothers & Elliott, Inc 521 US 457 (1997). [read post]
31 Jul 2023, 11:50 am by Josh Blackman
Harper, in which he was joined by the three liberals and Justice Kavanaugh, along with Justice Amy Coney Barrett in the latter case. [read post]
31 Jul 2023, 4:00 am by Eric Segall
Once again, preferences and politics, not law, were the coins of the realm at the United States Supreme Court.Despite the conservative justices' rhetorical embrace of public meaning originalism, the reality is that constitutional litigation almost always involves the balancing of important and conflicting values. 303 Creative v. [read post]