Search for: "LAWS v. DAVIS" Results 481 - 500 of 6,228
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Oct 2022, 4:53 am by Franklin C. McRoberts
Under a line of Delaware cases, a provision that the entity shall indemnify an owner, officer, or director “to the fullest extent permitted by law” provides a right of advancement by implication (Davis v EMSI Holding Co., No. 12854-VCS [Del Ch May 3, 2017]). [read post]
31 Oct 2022, 4:00 am by Michael C. Dorf
For the fairly obvious reason that in each case, the first certiorari question is whether the Court should overrule Grutter v. [read post]
25 Oct 2022, 9:30 pm by ernst
It will conclude with a keynote session featuring Professor Mary Zeigler of UC Davis Law who will present, “Dobbs v Jackson Women’s Health Organization and the Remaking of Constitutional Politics. [read post]
24 Oct 2022, 5:14 am by INFORRM
Canada The Superior Court of Justice, Ontario handed down judgement in Marcellin v LPS et all 2022 ONSC 5886. [read post]
21 Oct 2022, 9:30 pm by ernst
  It is curated by Mary Ziegler, UC Davis School of Law (Harvard Gazette).Randall Kennedy, HLS, interviewed on Walker v. [read post]
19 Oct 2022, 11:37 am by Jonathan Bailey
The issue is that, as unsettled as the law is in this space, the ethics are even less settled. [read post]
16 Oct 2022, 9:02 pm by Vikram David Amar
” In context, this word generally (as in Articles I and II) means a state’s lawmaking system—as the Supreme Court has repeatedly held in a century-old line of cases from Ohio ex rel Davis v. [read post]
10 Oct 2022, 7:38 am by Ezra Rosser
Mullaney, AOKI WATER JUSTICE CLINIC: UC Davis School of Law, Art Neill, NEW MEDIA RIGHTS’ INTERNET & MEDIA LAW CLINIC: California Western School of Law, Clare Pastore, ACCESS TO JUSTICE PRACTICUM: University of Southern California Gould School of Law, Ascanio Piomelli, COMMUNITY GROUP ADVOCACY AND SOCIAL LAWYERING CLINIC, UC Hastings College of the Law, Hina B. [read post]
7 Oct 2022, 8:21 am by INFORRM
The judgments in question are these: BT v CU [2021] EWFC 87; [2022] 1 WLR 1349 (1 November 2021) A v M [2021] EWFC 89; [2022] 1 FCR 445 (9 November 2021) Aylward-Davies v Chesterman [2022] EWFC 4; [2022] 2 FCR 541 (4 February 2022) Xanthopoulos v Rakshina [2022] EWFC 30; [2022] 2 FCR 712 (12 April 2022) XZ v YZ [2022] EWFC 49 (20 May 2022) (this being the decision granting an interim RRO in the case later reported as Gallagher v… [read post]
4 Oct 2022, 6:20 pm
Henrichsen, Henrichsen Law Group, PLLC, Jacksonville, FL, Victoria Blanche Kroell, Cole Scott & Kissane, PA, Jacksonville, FL, for Plaintiff-Appellant. [read post]