Search for: "LIMB v. LIMB"
Results 481 - 500
of 859
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Jul 2021, 3:33 am
On 9 March 2021, the Supreme Court heard the appeal in R (on the application of Fylde Coast Farms Ltd (formerly Oyston Estates Ltd)) v Fylde Borough Council. [read post]
28 Oct 2012, 11:56 am
That was basically the issue in Euro-Excellence v. [read post]
27 Jan 2012, 12:52 pm
Case Information: Larry and Lynn Welk v. [read post]
24 Jan 2013, 10:20 am
Blehm v. [read post]
10 Jun 2014, 5:11 am
As for the second case, it is easily recognisable as passing off.The decisionThe first limb of passing off is that the claimant enjoys goodwill in its business. [read post]
7 Jun 2019, 9:13 am
Moreover, the UK Court of Appeal clarified that the Non-discrimination limb of FRAND does not mean a ‘most favoured licensee‘. [read post]
1 May 2015, 8:43 am
Jensen; R. v. [read post]
1 Mar 2019, 8:44 am
In Gamble v. [read post]
7 Jan 2012, 6:10 pm
We’re going out on a limb here, but we believe that the Second Circuit may reverse and remand the lower court’s decision in the widely-followed Viacom v. [read post]
15 Mar 2019, 9:44 am
In Gamble v. [read post]
31 Mar 2007, 7:55 am
Fontes v. [read post]
16 Jan 2014, 4:01 pm
Mr Justice Tugendhat yesterday gave judgment in the case of Vidal-Hall and Others v Google Inc [2014] EWHC 13 (QB). [read post]
12 Jul 2010, 1:10 am
It noted that the problem of deciding the Court’s temporal jurisdiction had been considered with varying results in previous cases, notably Blecic v Croatia (2006) 43 E.H.R.R. 48, Moldovan v Romania (2007) 44 E.H.R.R. 16, Balasoiu v Romania (App. no. 37424/97), 2 September 2003, and Kholodova v Russia (App. no. 30651/05), 14 September 2006. [read post]
19 Jul 2012, 11:25 pm
ECtHR jurisprudence made clear that the state was not required to tolerate unlawful occupation Hoire v UK, Yordanova v Bulgari [read post]
19 Jul 2012, 11:25 pm
ECtHR jurisprudence made clear that the state was not required to tolerate unlawful occupation Hoire v UK, Yordanova v Bulgari [read post]
5 Oct 2011, 3:39 pm
Boren (1976)) and since (United States v. [read post]
19 Jul 2019, 11:58 am
The logic goes that replacing drivers with computers will lower that statistic and therefore save lives and limbs and lots of money. [read post]
19 Jul 2019, 11:58 am
The logic goes that replacing drivers with computers will lower that statistic and therefore save lives and limbs and lots of money. [read post]
3 Mar 2012, 5:36 pm
(“Daubert II”)(holding that for epidemiological testimony to be admissible to prove specific causation, there must have been a relative risk for the plaintiff of greater than 2) (“For an epidemiological study to show causation under a preponderance standard . . . the study must how that children whose mothers took Bendectin are more than twice as likely to develop limb reduction birth defects as children whose mothers did not. [read post]
