Search for: "Little v. King" Results 481 - 500 of 1,359
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Mar 2017, 3:15 am by Barry Sookman
Computer and Internet Weekly Updates for 2017-03-11 https://t.co/G2lRXLoEOH -> Over-55s 'more likely to use Kodi to watch pirated video than young adults' https://t.co/eH67pzWyfl -> Copyright and the public interest, a South African decision https://t.co/uhn7894wwg -> Copyright infringement suit dismissed Ogunkoya v Harding [2017] EWHC 470 (IPEC) (10 March 2017) https://t.co/UQU0cLBAAb -> Link to Nintendo v King TPM infringement case… [read post]
15 Mar 2017, 7:38 am by Rory Little
On Wednesday, March 22, the eight-justice court will hear argument in County of Los Angeles v. [read post]
14 Mar 2017, 4:27 am by Edith Roberts
” Briefly: At Fault Lines, Andrew King discusses Kokesh v. [read post]
13 Mar 2017, 8:48 am by Eugene Volokh
Ninth Circuit: If the Supreme Court can call a health-care exchange established by the federal government “an exchange established by [a] State,” see King v. [read post]
7 Mar 2017, 3:16 am by Dennis Crouch
(Daily.2016.Professors) Tristan Gray–Le Coz and Charles Duan, Apply It to the USPTO: Review of the Implementation of Alice v. [read post]
10 Feb 2017, 12:07 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
  Neutral: king is to man as queen is to woman. [read post]
2 Feb 2017, 9:01 pm by John Dean
King (2013), which opposed police who swabbed the mouth of someone arrested to see if his DNA could lead to other crimes; EEOC v. [read post]
10 Jan 2017, 7:11 am by Susan Hennessey
Once a nominee is Senate-confirmed, there is little incentive for the individual to fully and timely comply with ethics disclosure, especially of potentially controversial matters. [read post]
18 Dec 2016, 8:24 am by Smita Ghosh
The Last Throes of the British Pro-Nazi Right, 1940-45), Bill V. [read post]
11 Dec 2016, 11:54 pm by INFORRM
 It attracted an active betting market, a large volume of tweets and endless speculation about the views of the justices (based on little more than the odd probing question or facial expression). [read post]
5 Dec 2016, 3:20 am by Peter Mahler
The hard lesson learned by the petitioner in Matter of Norvell v Guchi’s Idea LLC, 2016 NY Slip Op 32307(U) [Sup Ct Kings County Nov. 18, 2016], has been taught before, starting most prominently with the First Department’s 2013 decision in Doyle v Icon, LLC and reinforced by that court two years later in Barone v Sowers, holding that minority member claims of oppressive majority conduct including systematic exclusion from the LLC’s… [read post]