Search for: "Long v. Clark" Results 481 - 500 of 1,358
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Mar 2017, 5:09 am by SHG
Not long after the sale, the Reagan revolution produced significantly lower tax rates on ordinary income and significantly higher tax rates on capital gains. [read post]
28 Mar 2017, 6:34 am by INFORRM
Non-monetary remedies are often as important, if not more, than damages, as was made clear by Tugendhat J in Clarke v Bain [2008] EWHC 2636 (QB): “Defamation actions are not primarily about recovering money damages, but about vindication of a claimant’s reputation. [read post]
27 Mar 2017, 4:29 pm by Dennis Crouch
Guest Post by Professor Tomás Gómez-Arostegui (Lewis & Clark Law School) One of the questions in Impression Prods., Inc. v. [read post]
1 Mar 2017, 9:30 am by Legal Beagle
  In a separate opinion (with which I agree) Lady Clark rejects an argument that there are insufficient relevant averments of any loss suffered by the pursuer (HC). [read post]
27 Feb 2017, 4:23 am by Edith Roberts
The first is Packingham v. [read post]
22 Feb 2017, 9:26 pm by Bill Marler
The prevalence of Listeria in ready-to-eat meats has not proven difficult to explain. [26, 29] As one expert in another much-cited article has noted: The centralized production of prepared ready-to-eat food products…increases the risk of higher levels of contamination, since it requires that foods be stored for long periods at refrigerated temperatures that favor the growth of Listeria. [read post]
9 Feb 2017, 12:11 pm
Tomas Gomez-Arostegui, Lewis & Clark Law School, has published Patent and Copyright Exhaustion in England circa 1800. [read post]
9 Feb 2017, 12:11 pm by Christine Corcos
Tomas Gomez-Arostegui, Lewis & Clark Law School, has published Patent and Copyright Exhaustion in England circa 1800. [read post]
8 Feb 2017, 6:30 am by Tom Pritchard
Court of Appeal decision In overturning the decision of first instance, Lord Justice Clark (with whom Lady Justice Gloster and Lord Justice Patten agreed) relied on the following reasons: In reviewing the case law regarding contractual interpretation (Arnold v Britton [2015] UKSC 36 and Gan Insurance Co Ltd v Tai Ping Insurance Co Ltd [2001] CLC 1, 103 being particularly significant) it can be said that “the clearer the language the less appropriate it may be to… [read post]