Search for: "M T v. D W" Results 481 - 500 of 1,652
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Apr 2019, 5:59 am by Joel R. Brandes
April 16, 2019Appellate Division, Second Department Appellate Division holds that Indian Child Welfare Act applies to Neglect Proceeding and Shinnecock Tribe had right to intervene In Matter of Durpee M, v Samantha Q., 2019 WL 1461831 (2d Dept., 2019) the mother and her husband (father) were the parents of the child, who was born in January 2017. [read post]
15 Apr 2019, 6:22 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  Consider Milstein v. [read post]
11 Apr 2019, 8:30 am by Eugene Volokh
The injunction only opens the door to the criminal courthouse; it doesn’t itself determine in any binding way that certain specific statements can’t be repeated. [read post]
11 Apr 2019, 8:30 am by Eugene Volokh
I'm continuing to serialize my forthcoming Penn Law Review article on Anti-Libel Injunctions. [read post]
8 Apr 2019, 11:31 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  Gratz: counternotices v. notices. [read post]
8 Apr 2019, 9:20 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Uncertainty makes it v. difficult for nonprofits to provide a robust environment that we all depend on. [read post]
1 Apr 2019, 4:15 am by Eric B. Meyer
Image Credit: Pixabay (https://pixabay.com/en/marijuana-scales-legalization-drugs-2754249/) The case is called Wild v. [read post]
29 Mar 2019, 1:16 pm
  I'm not saying they're necessarily the same person, since I don't know.But it'd surely be unfortunate if they were.One final mention. [read post]
20 Mar 2019, 3:53 am by Edith Roberts
” At the Yale Journal on Regulation’s Notice & Comment blog, Michael Kagan observes that “[t]he words ‘Chevron’ and ‘defer’ do not appear anywhere in any of the opinions,” and that “[w]hile we should not be surprised by Chevron’s practical irrelevance in Nielsen v. [read post]