Search for: "MATTER OF N B" Results 481 - 500 of 5,108
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Jun 2016, 5:30 am
Matter of Gonzalez Romo, 26 I&N Dec. 743 (BIA 2016) - The Board held that solicitation to commit a crime involving moral turpitude is a CIMT and renders even a returning LPR inadmissible under INA § 212(a)(2)(A)(i)(I). [read post]
7 Jun 2016, 5:30 am
Matter of Gonzalez Romo, 26 I&N Dec. 743 (BIA 2016) - The Board held that solicitation to commit a crime involving moral turpitude is a CIMT and renders even a returning LPR inadmissible under INA § 212(a)(2)(A)(i)(I). [read post]
3 Aug 2023, 6:00 am by beng
New LexisNexis Resource for In-House Counsel This is the need that LexisNexis is seeking to address with the introduction of a new practice area on Lexis+ that is dedicated to assisting in-house counsel: I n-House Advisor . [read post]
13 Aug 2017, 1:59 pm by Giles Peaker
Ms B was in temporary accommodation provided by Dacorum BC. [read post]
19 Sep 2011, 6:48 am by Eric Schweibenz
” Regarding the substance of the matter, ALJ Rogers found that Remy had not shown that Dr. [read post]
18 May 2009, 9:19 am
  Justice Souter (joined by Justices Stevens, Ginsburg, and Breyer) said that a trial judge is bound to accept the allegations of a complaint as true, no matter how skeptical he or she may be. [read post]
14 May 2009, 4:12 pm
NMCCA 200800052 (N-M. [read post]
16 Mar 2012, 3:10 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Maroney, Ponzini Spencer 97 N. 2d at 105-106, 736 N.Y.S.2d 291 , 761 E.2d 1018; Matter of Jordan v. [read post]
1 Oct 2014, 3:09 pm by Schachtman
” Id. at 1293 & n.7; see also “The Contrivance Standard for Expert Witness Gatekeeping” (Sept. 28, 2014). [read post]
5 Jan 2021, 5:40 am by Steve Lubet
Elections Comm’n, No. 20-3414, 2020 WL 7654295, at *4 (7th Cir. [read post]
15 Aug 2012, 8:25 am
The Florida securities lawyers at McCabe Rabin, P.A. represent investors nationwide in FINRA arbitration matters. [read post]
28 Nov 2016, 2:45 am by Miquel Montañá
These were handed down on 9 December 2010, and the patentability of the “processes” was denied for being contrary to Article 53(b) of the EPC. [read post]
25 Jun 2013, 2:30 pm by Will Baude
Its failure to act leaves us today with no choice but to declare §4(b) unconstitutional." [read post]
24 Dec 2012, 6:28 am by Seyfarth Shaw LLP
  Implications For Employers Discovery disputes are often hotly contested matters. [read post]