Search for: "MATTER OF T J F" Results 481 - 500 of 2,521
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 May 2017, 2:47 pm
Price, 343 F. 3d 223, 237–239 (CA3 2003) (Alito, J.). [read post]
25 Sep 2014, 6:57 am
See, e.g., id. at 751, 762, 763 (lead opinion); id. at 772-73 (White, J., concurring in the judgment). [read post]
19 May 2015, 8:18 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Cohen, 908 F.2d 555 (9th Cir. 1990) ([pointedly] Kozinski, J.), was inapposite, because no one in that case challenged the existence of an independent copyright on the special-effects footage that was independently fixed. [read post]
7 Dec 2015, 6:45 am
I don't write checks to my clients[,] other way around. . . .Would you believe that [the prior office manager] used to f* * *ing argue with me about it. [read post]
26 Jul 2019, 11:18 am
| Skykick - why does it matter & what could it mean for trade marks? [read post]
19 Jan 2015, 11:36 pm
” (alterations in original) (citation and quotation marks omitted)); MEMC, 420 F.3d at 1375–76 (“[T]he reach of section 271(a) is limited to infringing activities that occur within the United States. [read post]
26 Feb 2015, 5:00 am
  Without the Third Restatement, that doesn’t happen.Just because we said so, however, doesn’t make it so. [read post]
16 Aug 2020, 12:49 pm by Russell Knight
When it comes to discovery, if you don’t ask…you don’t get. [read post]
13 Jul 2012, 6:11 am by David Hart QC
But I don’t suppose either Phaidon or Baron de Coubertin would have predicted the move which triggered this piece of litigation. [read post]
7 Jun 2009, 2:15 pm
See Rochester Denial, 375 F.3d at 1313-14 (Rader, J., dissenting); Moba, 325 F.3d at 1326 (Rader, J., concurring). [read post]