Search for: "Mark J. Self" Results 481 - 500 of 1,168
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Apr 2018, 9:30 pm by Bobby Chen
In a forthcoming article in the Vanderbilt Law Review, William J. [read post]
11 Nov 2007, 11:31 am
Rev. 601 (2001) Lucian Arye Bebchuk & Mark J. [read post]
17 Dec 2006, 10:48 am
Rev. 601 (2001) Lucian Arye Bebchuk & Mark J. [read post]
1 Feb 2009, 2:42 am
Rev. 601 (2001) Lucian Arye Bebchuk & Mark J. [read post]
17 Jan 2021, 3:31 pm by Chuck Cosson
Lewis compared this relaxation of control to letting go of nervous self-consciousness when meeting people. [read post]
4 Mar 2024, 12:47 pm
The text of the percuriam and the two opinions (Barrett, J., and Sotomayer, J.) follow. [read post]
23 Aug 2011, 2:36 pm
The past two weeks have been both enlightening, and depressing -- despite my light-hearted reference to a quip by the incomparable Yogi Berra for my title. [read post]
21 Sep 2010, 8:17 am
The design proprietor said that if this is essentially a trade mark infringement case he put the trade mark proprietor to proof as to whether the trade mark has been used for the past five years. [read post]
21 Aug 2023, 2:32 am by centerforartlaw
Ryder Ripps is a self-described “conceptual artist” known for previous unconventional projects that have sparked controversy and discussion. [read post]
1 Feb 2012, 8:41 am by 1 Crown Office Row
The Court (Lord Judge, Lord Neuberger and Maurice Kay LJ) unanimously upheld the rulings of Mann J and Vos J that, as a result of the operation of section 72 of the Senior Courts Act 1981, Mr Mulcaire was not entitled to rely on his privilege against self-incrimination (“PSI”). [read post]
20 Feb 2022, 4:38 am
Cover" held at the Touro College Law Center and organized by the remarkable Samuel J. [read post]
19 Sep 2019, 9:56 am by Eugene Volokh
This refusal was just the denial of a benefit; no-one was being threatened with jail or fines for using the name—owners of this mark were just not being given access to certain useful remedies against those who would infringe the mark. [read post]