Search for: "Matter of Investigative Grand Jury Proceedings" Results 481 - 500 of 820
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Sep 2015, 6:00 am by David Kris
  The U.S. itself takes exactly the same position with respect to grand jury subpoenas compelling production of records stored abroad, and (as discussed below) with respect to the SCA provisions compelling production of email data stored abroad. [read post]
21 Sep 2015, 5:15 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  A jury could find that General simply told JEMSU to “have at it,” which means that JEMSU’s posting of false information could be within the scope of the authority delegated to it. [read post]
9 Sep 2015, 6:10 am
Please feel free to give me a call anytime to discuss this matter. . . . [read post]
29 Jul 2015, 2:30 pm
” “Grand jury proceedings are secret, and no grand juror, or other person specified in subdivision three of this section or section 215.70 of the penal law may, except in the lawful discharge of his duties or upon written order of the court, disclose the nature or substance of any grand jury testimony, evidence, or any decision, result or other matter attending a grand jury proceeding. [read post]
22 Jun 2015, 7:38 am by Ken White
Some have argued that the Department of Justice must have had information spurring them to use the grand jury to pierce the anonymity of people engaged in protected political speech. [read post]
18 Jun 2015, 3:35 pm by Jack Sharman
  In addition, unlike grand jury investigations, Congressional investigations do not remain secret for extended periods. [read post]
17 Jun 2015, 7:03 am
A grand jury is so named because traditionally it has a greater number of jurors than a trial jury, called a petty jury (from the French word petit meaning `small’).Getting back to Beattie, the Appeals Court began its analysis of his appeal by explaining that`[t]he crime of perjury in a judicial proceeding occurs whenever one “wil[ ]fully swears or affirms falsely in a matter material to the issue or point in question. [read post]
3 Jun 2015, 5:36 am by Gritsforbreakfast
   The Harris County DA's office also improperly instructed prosecutors to redact offense report information "obtained by a grand jury subpoena," disingenuously conflating confidentiality of grand jury proceedings with the information presented to them to create a new category of information excluded from the defense that's not contemplated in the statute. [read post]
8 May 2015, 7:17 am by Wells Bennett
” The panel acknowledged that grand jury subpoenas—which also employ the “relevance” standard, and which serve as a model for Section 215—may allow the government to obtain large amounts of information in order to find relevant data contained therein. [read post]
24 Apr 2015, 3:00 am by Jeff Welty
The conviction was based on the italicized portion of a statement (by Bonds) made in response to a question (by a federal prosecutor) during an investigative grand jury proceeding regarding a steroid ring with which Bonds was allegedly involved: Q. [read post]
15 Apr 2015, 6:30 am by The Public Employment Law Press
”In Proceeding No. 2 pursuant to CPLR Article 78 Mossman sought a court order directing the County “to provide such a legal defense in connection with a subsequent grand jury proceeding. [read post]
9 Apr 2015, 8:20 am by Jeff Welty
Some states apparently allow crime victims or witnesses to approach the grand jury to seek an indictment. [read post]
2 Apr 2015, 1:30 pm by Carrie Cordero
“Introduce Adversarial Process” The Brennan Center report supports proposals that have gained attention since the Snowden disclosures to introduce adversarial process to FISC proceedings. [read post]
14 Mar 2015, 4:22 pm by Stephen Bilkis
A Nassau Abuse and Neglect Lawyer said that, defendant next argues that the grand jury proceeding was defective because the prosecutor failed to present evidence of the police informant’s prior convictions to the grand jury. [read post]
13 Mar 2015, 4:48 am by Donald Barbati
Peter Barnes, said the matters should be handled by a state grand jury and that, in case that do no result in an indictment, the transcripts of the proceedings should be released to the public. [read post]
6 Mar 2015, 3:30 pm by Stephen Bilkis
Finally, it must be noted that Criminal Procedure Law § 190.25(4) provides: "Grand jury proceedings are secret, and no grand juror or other person specified in subdivision three 2 may, except in the lawful discharge of his duties or upon written order of the court, disclose the nature or substance of any grand jury testimony, or any decision, result or other matter attending a grand jury proceeding. [read post]
9 Feb 2015, 6:08 am
  A federal grand jury then issued a superseding indictment that charged Vaskas withthree counts of possessing child pornography, in violation of 18 U.S. [read post]
27 Jan 2015, 3:46 pm by Michael Lumer
As long as these officers could get in front of a grand jury, they would be forever shielded from any civil liability, no matter how unconscionable their actions had been. [read post]
19 Jan 2015, 4:54 pm by John C. Manoog III
In the case of In the Matter of a Grand Jury Investigation, a certain law firm agreed to represent a client in April 2013. [read post]