Search for: "Matter of Kagan"
Results 481 - 500
of 2,797
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Jun 2010, 1:27 pm
As Kerr noted: No matter who he chooses, Obama will continue to break new ground, or at least help bolster some of the low numbers of people of certain arguably underrepresented backgrounds on the current Court. [read post]
27 Jun 2012, 9:21 am
Kagan joined the court in 2010. [read post]
21 Jun 2024, 3:12 pm
Smith did not raise that issue in his petition for review, Kagan wrote. [read post]
11 Jul 2013, 1:31 pm
Whether an applicant does or doesn’t accept the conditions prior to approval should not matter; the applicant should be free to challenge the conditions in either case. [read post]
13 Apr 2016, 5:34 am
It Whitaker, the 7th Circuit adopts the Kagan concurrence and finds it equally applicable to use of a drug-sniffing dog in an apartment building: The use of a drug-sniffing dog here clearly invaded reasonable privacy expectations, as explained in Justice Kagan’s concurring opinion in Jardines. [read post]
9 Aug 2016, 9:06 am
Justices Elena Kagan, Sonia Sotomayor, and Ruth Bader Ginsburg voted to deny the school board’s request. [read post]
30 Jun 2010, 8:33 pm
Well, of course, not everything is over – we are still glued to the TV, watching Elena Kagan’s confirmation hearings with enormous interest. [read post]
4 Nov 2010, 9:21 am
Mazda, the Court (with Justice Kagan recused), struggled with whether a two-part administrative record provided a sufficient basis to support preemption of state-law product liability claims. [read post]
15 Jun 2011, 7:47 am
” As an initial matter, the Court rejected the analogy – drawn by the Federal Circuit – between a private trustee and the role of the government in this case. [read post]
18 Nov 2014, 7:55 am
However, because the war was already underway, geography was a delicate matter. [read post]
26 Dec 2022, 6:00 am
Guest Post by Odia Kagan You may think that, unless your website is specifically intended for kids, you don’t need to worry about the Children’s Online Privacy Protection Act of 1998 (COPPA). [read post]
27 Jun 2011, 7:27 am
I’m reading the opinion now, and hope to have more to say about it soon.UPDATE: Here’s a brief summary of the Justices’ views on the matter:Majority (Justice Scalia, joined by Justices Kennedy, Ginsburg, Sotomayor, and Kagan):(1) Video games are within the protection of the First Amendment, just as are other forms of entertainment (and entertainment has long been seen as constitutionally protected, partly because it can embody ideas, including political… [read post]
20 Jan 2015, 8:48 am
(2015) Download OpinionBreyer (author), joined by Roberts, Scalia, Kennedy, Ginsburg, Sotomayor, and Kagan; Thomas (dissenting) joined by Alito. [read post]
13 Aug 2010, 10:54 am
My own personal views don’t much matter, but I expect that all the repeat players in the Supreme Court bar would agree. [read post]
19 Jan 2011, 9:09 am
Nelson included a fascinating exchange between Justice Scalia (joined by Justice Thomas) and Justice Alito (writing for the rest of the Court except for Justice Kagan, who was recused). [read post]
3 Nov 2011, 12:05 am
Justice Kagan disagreed. [read post]
30 Sep 2011, 2:00 pm
The Law Blog has also asked the Supreme Court to comment about concerns raised about Kagan’s impartiality. [read post]
19 Mar 2012, 1:45 pm
The matter came to a head after Milner, in which the Court found that FOIA’s text provided only a limited exemption for personnel practices, not the wide-ranging exemption for agency information that the government had claimed. [read post]
1 Mar 2014, 11:00 am
Among other things, the group touched on security matters, including America’s use of military and other power, and the broader security challenges facing the international system. [read post]
11 Feb 2019, 2:45 pm
But none of that mattered to the Supreme Court majority in Trump v. [read post]
