Search for: "Matter of Lilly"
Results 481 - 500
of 740
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Jul 2007, 10:43 am
Michael Katz (Katz), Jonathan Alpert (Alpert), the law firm of Goodman, Katz, Scheele & Bauswell (Katz firm), Lilly M. [read post]
6 Feb 2007, 10:53 am
Lillie Randles, et al v. [read post]
24 Jun 2013, 9:01 pm
This matters because the employer’s liability under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 for workplace harassment committed by supervisors is much stronger than it is for harassment inflicted by co-workers. [read post]
27 Apr 2023, 9:22 am
In this regard, in its judgment of 12 December 2013 (case C-493/12, Eli Lilly v Human Genome Sciences), the CJEU made the following observations: “30. [read post]
3 Apr 2007, 9:04 am
The proposal is now pending at Altria, Amgen, Chevron, Eli Lilly, Pfizer, and Wyeth. [read post]
22 Sep 2015, 7:00 am
” To be sure, in the wake of Ginsburg’s 2007 dissent in the Ledbetter case, a later Congress did pass the Lilly Ledbetter Fair Pay Act. [read post]
30 Oct 2013, 8:32 am
Eli Lilly & Co., 598 F.3d 1336, 1351 (Fed. [read post]
19 Sep 2014, 5:50 pm
However Professor Cross pointed out that in reality matters are not so clear cut. [read post]
20 Mar 2014, 7:48 am
Eli Lilly & Co., 598 F.3d 1336, 1344 (Fed. [read post]
23 Sep 2017, 12:39 pm
Cir. 2015); Eli Lilly, 845 F.3d at 1370. [read post]
20 Apr 2012, 10:36 am
” AstraZeneca Decision, at pp. 12-13 (quoting Eli Lilly & Co. v. [read post]
14 Nov 2023, 4:18 am
He noted that it is to be expected that the subject-matter of the declaration is different. [read post]
18 Jul 2014, 11:55 am
Wife puts New Baby’s carseat in the front seat, and plows into a telephone pole (or something else, it really doesn't matter). [read post]
9 Nov 2015, 7:39 am
Given this, the fact an anti-PD-1 antibody is not made or tested in the priority document does not matter (para [125]). [read post]
6 Oct 2010, 9:19 am
He wondered why, if a state treated a matter as within a hearsay exception, the Confrontation Clause should require exclusion.There was some irony here, because Justice Breyer’s concurrence in Lilly v. [read post]
31 May 2012, 3:55 am
Eli Lilly & Co. v. [read post]
4 Jan 2024, 9:42 am
Eli Lilly & Co., 598 F.3d 1336 (Fed. [read post]
8 Feb 2010, 10:27 am
Zyprexa MDL Plaintiffs' Steering Committee II and Eli Lilly and Co., No. 07-3815-cv (2d Cir. [read post]
29 Feb 2012, 9:05 am
Eli Lilly & Co., 2011 U.S. [read post]
9 Apr 2010, 7:17 am
(...)Our precedent has long required proof of misjoinder or nonjoinder of co-inventors by clear and convincing evidence.3 See Eli Lilly & Co. v. [read post]
