Search for: "Medtronic Inc." Results 481 - 500 of 1,086
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Jun 2012, 1:30 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
Medtronic Sofamor Danek, Inc., 567 F.3d 1314, 1324 (Fed. [read post]
18 Jun 2012, 4:17 am by Max Kennerly, Esq.
Medtronic, Inc., 552 U.S. 312 (2008), In 1996, Charles Riegel underwent angioplasty to dilate his coronary artery. [read post]
8 Jun 2012, 5:00 pm by Law Lady
Medtronic, 19 No. 8 Westlaw Journal Medical Devices 7, Westlaw Journal Medical Devices June 4, 2012 Medtronic Inc. is being sued by a Florida man who says his Sprint Fidelis defibrillator lead cracked, exposing him to repeated, unnecessary shocks from his implanted cardiac rhythm management system. [read post]
7 Jun 2012, 2:40 pm by Bexis
Medtronic, Inc., 2010 WL 4483970, at *3 (D. [read post]
5 Jun 2012, 6:51 pm
Clayton Act limiting partial stock acquisitions for as low as ten (10) per cent of holding of voting stock (Medtronic Inc. 63 Fed. [read post]
21 May 2012, 1:50 pm by Bexis
  Ironically, the defendants won because of the adverse preemption decision in Medtronic, Inc. v. [read post]
17 May 2012, 12:05 pm by Bexis
  There’s usually no preemption in Class II metallic implants like hip implants under Medtronic, Inc. v. [read post]
16 May 2012, 12:22 pm by Bexis
Medtronic, Inc., 2012 WL 1380265, at *4 (E.D. [read post]
9 May 2012, 7:53 am
Medtronic Shareholder Suit Medtronic Inc agreed to pay $85 million to settle a shareholder lawsuit accusing it of making misleading statements concerning Infuse. [read post]
1 May 2012, 9:02 am
Two year later his work led to a similar pulling off the shelves of a defibrillator created by Medtronic, Inc. [read post]
26 Apr 2012, 7:48 am
Medtronic Inc., Richard Stengel of Arizona and his wife, Mary Lou Stengel, brought a lawsuit alleging several causes of action against Medtronic after a pain pump implanted in Richard made him permanently paraplegic. [read post]
21 Apr 2012, 8:47 pm by constitutional lawblogger
Medtronic, Inc. that the plaintiffs' state law failure-to-warn claim based on Medtronic's failure to provide disclosures to the FDA is impliedly preempted under the... [read post]