Search for: "Metallized Products, Inc." Results 481 - 500 of 1,333
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Feb 2016, 6:40 am by Andrew Delaney
” The State sued these defendants on numerous grounds and wanted “compensation for damages to natural resources and for the costs of investigating, monitoring, and remediating those damages, as well as injunctive and equitable relief and punitive damages” One of the defendants, Total Petrochemicals & Refining USA, Inc. [read post]
10 Feb 2016, 12:42 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
Cir. 2007), Sandt Tech. v.Resco Metal & Plastics Corp., 264 F.3d 1344, 1350–51(Fed. [read post]
27 Jan 2016, 1:34 pm by Clay Hodges
  As with most of the metal-on-metal artificial hips, Stryker pushed these products on the market using the 510(k) process. [read post]
15 Jan 2016, 8:21 am by Rosenfeld Injury Lawyers
Court records show that trucker Radomir Cvetkovski hauled metal products and machinery for his employer, Steel & Machinery Transportation Inc. [read post]
15 Jan 2016, 8:21 am by Rosenfeld Injury Lawyers
Court records show that trucker Radomir Cvetkovski hauled metal products and machinery for his employer, Steel & Machinery Transportation Inc. [read post]
14 Jan 2016, 9:04 am by Eugene Volokh
Such claims are sometimes allowed in federal court (see Grable & Sons Metal Products, Inc. v. [read post]
3 Jan 2016, 12:16 pm by Patrick E. Knie
Univar, USA, Inc., the plaintiff worked as a maintenance mechanic at a plant that produced a precious metal catalyst used in the automobile industry and refined metals from recycled materials. [read post]
28 Dec 2015, 12:36 pm by MBettman
They claimed the CVPI was defectively manufactured because the length of the crimp (the method of folding metal over other metal, used to attach the sending unit to the fuel tank) was too short. [read post]
1 Dec 2015, 9:58 am by Law Offices of Jeffrey S. Glassman
The case is referred to as In re: Wright Medical Technology, Inc., Conserve Hip Implant Products Liability Litigation. [read post]
1 Dec 2015, 8:35 am by Bob Eisenbach
Richmond Metal Finishers, Inc., 756 F.2d 1043 (4th Cir. 1985), to hold rejection of the Agreement meant that Mission lost both the exclusive distribution rights and any continued rights to the trademark license. [read post]
1 Dec 2015, 8:35 am by Bob Eisenbach
Richmond Metal Finishers, Inc., 756 F.2d 1043 (4th Cir. 1985), to hold rejection of the Agreement meant that Mission lost both the exclusive distribution rights and any continued rights to the trademark license. [read post]
30 Nov 2015, 3:31 am
Hober, Inc., Serial No. 85643266 [Refusals to register the product configuration shown below, for "Gun parts, namely, bottom metal for custom guns that incorporates a trigger guard shape," on the alternative grounds of functionality under Section 2(e)(5) and lack of acquired distinctiveness. [read post]