Search for: "Meyers, in Matter of"
Results 481 - 500
of 1,206
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 May 2016, 5:56 am
A couple of federal judges, a handful of fabulous writers with centuries of experience covering the gamut of criminal law experience, offering all perspective no matter how much they confirm your bias or make you cry? [read post]
10 May 2016, 12:49 pm
“The fact that Uber goes to such lengths to portray itself—one might even say disguise itself—as the mere purveyor of an ‘app’ cannot shield it from the consequences of its operating as much more,” wrote the court, rejecting a defense that has failed Uber in employment suits against the company as well (Meyer v. [read post]
6 May 2016, 4:54 am
The Answer May Be Changing — via Troutman Sanders HR Law Matters Seth Meyers: Anti-Trans Bathroom Laws Undermine “Concept of Self” — via TVLine Does Sexual Harassment Training Lead Men To Blame The Victims? [read post]
29 Apr 2016, 6:47 am
“We could pay for our own way; I’m just trying to think how that would work,” said Meyer. [read post]
29 Apr 2016, 4:47 am
No matter how weird you think your job is, I’m going to bet it’s not this weird. [read post]
22 Apr 2016, 4:11 am
— via Employment Matters Blog My boss freaked out when he saw my menstrual products and called me unprofessional — via Ask a Manager ADA: Are You Participating In The Interactive Process In “Good Faith”? [read post]
8 Apr 2016, 4:49 am
— via Eric Meyer’s The Employer Handbook Blog The Blunt Truth – ADA, FMLA and Medical Marijuana, How Do They Mix? [read post]
3 Apr 2016, 9:16 pm
Friday, April 8th at 12:15 pm: At the New America Foundation, Patrik Meyer and Peter Bergen will discuss China's Counter-Extremism Efforts in Xinxiang: Radicalizing the Uyghurs? [read post]
31 Mar 2016, 9:27 am
Both cases challenged the Public Employment Relations Board’s (PERB) granting of an employee organization’s request for fact finding under the Meyers-Milias-Brown Act (MMBA). [read post]
26 Mar 2016, 7:24 am
Prosecutor Nathan Wood from Wharton this week accused his boss, the elected DA Ross Kurtz, of advising attorneys in the office to avoid black jurors as a matter of strategy. [read post]
18 Mar 2016, 4:12 am
— via Eric Meyer’s The Employer Handbook Blog Trial by Fire: Unpaid Trial Periods for Prospective Employees — via Employment Discrimination Report The DOL Says You Might be a Horizontal Joint Employer — What? [read post]
16 Mar 2016, 11:00 am
Richard Meyer, an art history professor at Stanford University, explained that, “What Mapplethorpe understood is that you’ll never get rid of censorship altogether, but when censorship of art happens, it’s used as an opportunity or forum for public dialogue about why art matters in a democratic culture. [read post]
15 Mar 2016, 2:10 pm
Public Employment Relations Board was whether factfinding under the Meyers-Milias-Brown Act (MMBA) is limited to comprehensive negotiations related to a new or successor memorandum of understanding (MOU) or whether it broadly applies to all bargaining impasses regarding any matter within the scope of representation. [read post]
11 Mar 2016, 4:25 am
Here’s the rest of what I read this week: Discrimination HR 101: Temporary disabilities and the ADA — via Eric Meyer’s The Employer Handbook Blog Dilemma of the Month: When a Personal Matter Gets Professional — via Evil HR Lady, Suzanne Lucas Preventing Discrimination For Dummies! [read post]
10 Mar 2016, 6:46 pm
Meyer Enterprises LLC, 34 Maple Ave. [read post]
10 Mar 2016, 5:02 am
This post originally appeared on Meyers Roman’s Ohio OSHA Law Blog. [read post]
8 Mar 2016, 3:30 am
But, in her defense, there’s only so much Meyer that a young impressionable associate can take. [read post]
4 Mar 2016, 4:57 am
— via Employment Matters Blog Who knows what evil lurks in the hearts of employees? [read post]
26 Feb 2016, 12:34 pm
It gives governmental officials the ability to freely and openly discuss matters of policy without fear that those discussions will be subject to discovery. [read post]
24 Feb 2016, 9:13 am
(The holding on the veto charge is a matter of state law, on which the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals has the final word; the interpretation of what the coercion statute actually covers is also a matter of state law, though the question whether, as interpreted, the statute violates the First Amendment is a matter of federal law.) 4. [read post]
