Search for: "Minie v. State"
Results 481 - 500
of 847
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Sep 2013, 9:01 pm
Supreme Court in United States v. [read post]
6 Sep 2013, 3:47 am
Sheetz of Delaware, Inc. v. [read post]
5 Sep 2013, 12:54 pm
Eastman Chemical Co. v. [read post]
2 Sep 2013, 9:01 pm
The Ruling in United States v. [read post]
18 Aug 2013, 4:03 pm
Since Chimel - many other cases have broadened this holding including the case of United States v. [read post]
12 Aug 2013, 9:24 am
Ctr. v. [read post]
5 Aug 2013, 10:00 am
This likely means a fee hearing will be a combination of evidence presentation (a mini-trial of the plaintiff's low moments, in other words) and legal argument. [read post]
2 Aug 2013, 11:07 am
United States, 431 U.S. 324 (1977), for the notion that individual class members (after a stage I liability finding) are entitled to a presumption that that were discriminated and their individual damages can be heard in mini-trials per Teamsters. [read post]
2 Aug 2013, 11:07 am
United States, 431 U.S. 324 (1977), for the notion that individual class members (after a stage I liability finding) are entitled to a presumption that that were discriminated and their individual damages can be heard in mini-trials per Teamsters. [read post]
2 Aug 2013, 5:46 am
American Institute of Physics v. [read post]
31 Jul 2013, 1:45 pm
United States, 431 U.S. 324 (1977), for the notion that individual class members (after a stage I liability finding) are entitled to a presumption that that were discriminated and their individual damages can be heard in mini-trials per Teamsters. [read post]
26 Jul 2013, 6:00 am
[United States v. [read post]
19 Jul 2013, 9:10 am
By Eric Goldman Lisa Zaltz v. [read post]
17 Jul 2013, 4:47 pm
In this “narrow range of cases,” the sentencing court could examine court documents – the charging instrument and the jury instructions – to determine if the state conviction was for the branch of the relevant crime that matched the generic federal definition of the predicate offense for a “violent felony” under the ACCA. [read post]
8 Jul 2013, 11:11 am
Sharp and the Supreme Court’s 1967 opinion in Loving v. [read post]
3 Jul 2013, 7:01 am
Even in light of last week’s decision in US v. [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 2:40 pm
Just as Lawrence v. [read post]
25 Jun 2013, 6:13 pm
In Vance v Ball State University, the 5-4 majority endorsed a narrow definition of the meaning of “supervisor” for purposes of determining employer liability under Title VII. [read post]
21 Jun 2013, 12:30 pm
Lozano v. [read post]
